Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 281 to 300 of 925

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-301	5.3. Export taxes Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-09	Madagascar: Department of Customs	Madagascar	Resolved 2010-07-26	View
Complaint:	Royalty levy of 1,5% is charged exports of transformed wood
Resolution status note:	This is a measure to safeguard the environment. The elimination of non-tariff barriers will be done gradually.
NTB-000-103	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-26	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia imposed export levies on live animals, hides and skins .
NTB-000-228	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-28	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Botswana	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	In South Africa, Minister can impose export tax under the Livestock and meat industries Act
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that this act is in Botswana not SA. SA has an ‘Animal Health Act and the Meat Safety Act’, there are no export taxes under this act.
NTB-000-309	5.3. Export taxes Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-09	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Ministry of Trade	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Resolved 2010-07-30	View
Complaint:	Export duty is levied on timber.
NTB-000-141	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-27	Mauritius: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Mauritius charges an export tax on sugar
Resolution status note:	Mauritius reported that taxes were eliminated in 2004
NTB-000-277	5.3. Export taxes	2009-09-08	Rwanda: Ministry of Trade	Rwanda	Resolved 2011-10-27	View
Complaint:	Export levies of 15% is charged on unprocessed goat hides
Resolution status note:	Rwanda hs lifted the ban on exportation of raw hides and skins. However, the 5th EAC regional forum on NTBs held from 1-3 Septmber 2011 noted that the ban was appllied by all EAC countries with the aim to encourage value addition on raw hides towards export.
NTB-000-648	5.3. Export taxes Policy/Regulatory	2014-12-11	Uganda: Uganda Revenue Authority	Rwanda	Resolved 2015-11-18	View
Complaint:	Charge of "export tax" of 0.2 % of raw materials exported from Uganda by Rwanda Premier Tobacco Company Ltd
Resolution status note:	At the 16th EAC Forum on NTBs, Uganda undertook to study evidence provided by Rwanda and report back to the next meeting of the forum. UGANDA is adhering to EAC preferential treatment.
NTB-001-065	5.3. Export taxes	2022-04-01	Botswana: Ministry of Finance	South Africa	Resolved 2023-10-05	View
Complaint:	Botswana government is about to introduce the Tax Stamps on all imported products and that would affect the South African Wine Industry. The Tax Stamp imposition has been confirmed by the Botswana Minister of Finance and they have appointed the Service Provide that would conduct a Research.
Resolution status note:	The NTB BW NCP has provided the legal instruments gazetted by the BW Government on the matter.
NTB-001-311	5.3. Export taxes	2026-03-02	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa		Resolved 2026-05-25	View
Complaint:	It is reported by the Truckers Association of Zambia that the DRC Revenue Authority - General Directorate of Taxes, 3 weeks ago, introduced an import and export tax of about $85, and this has been reported at Kasumbalesa Border Post. The procedure and rationale in which this was introduced is unknown to Zambia, therefore, feedback is sought from our colleagues in DRC on this matter.
Resolution status note:	On 4 May 2026, the Zambia Focal Point reported that they had not received any feedback or official communication from the complaint. Additionally, no further complaints have been brought by Zambian nationals, so the matter can be regarded as resolved.
NTB-000-072	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Malawi	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South African Government has monopoly in the trading of basic food commodities.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of Basic Food Commodities in South Africa.
NTB-000-071	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Raw sugar can only be exported through a single channel
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that all excess raw sugar is exported by SASA on behalf of producers simply to safeguard on logistical costs etc to minimize the distortive effects of the world market. The manner in which it is done in SA does not conform to what is normally referred to as single channel - the implications of single channel can be much broader.
NTB-000-098	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single marketing channel for dairy
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that there is free entry of other players. It is not restrictive
NTB-000-096	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single channeling marketing for wheat.
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that she does not have a single marketing channel for wheat.
NTB-000-097	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2020-03-13	View
Complaint:	Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat.
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that the BMC Act is under review by Ministry of Agriculture to allow entry of other players.
NTB-000-097	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2020-03-13	View
Complaint:	Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat.
Resolution status note:	On 13 March 2020, Botswana Focal Point reported that the Botswana Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food Security was in the process of establishing a meat regulator that will oversee import and export of meat products including beef. A regulation was issued late 2019 repealing the clause on the Botswana Meat Commission (BMC) Act that gave BMC the mandate as the sole exporter of cattle and its edible products, and instead mandated the Minister of Agricultural Development and Food Security to consider applications for any person wishing to export beef and its products.
NTB-000-101	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Zimbabwe: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Zimbabwe has single marketing channel for basic commodities.
Resolution status note:	Zimbabwe reported that this is no longer obtaining.
NTB-000-102	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Mauritius: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Mauritius has single marketing channel for agricultural products
Resolution status note:	Mauritius reported that she is a net food importer and therefore state regulated agencies are necessary to coordinate food imports into that country for food security purposes
NTB-000-074	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Malawi	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South African Government has monopoly on trade in tobacco
Resolution status note:	South Afric areported that the applied tariff rate for tobacco imported from SADC countries is zero. Apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of tobacco in South Africa.
NTB-000-099	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single marketing channel for maize
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that she has multi channel maize marketing. Ministry of Agriculture issue import permits to ensure balance between local sourcing and importation.
NTB-000-126	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Eswatini: Ministry of Trade	Eswatini	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Single channel marketing for sugar and sugar products.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that the status quo remains because the Sugar Act has not been reviewed.

<< Previous 1 2 3...13 14 15 16 17...45 46 47 Next >>

Display:

COMESA-EAC-SADC

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints