| Complaint number |
NTB Type
Check allUncheck all |
Date of incident |
Location |
Reporting country or region (additional) |
Status |
Actions |
|
NTB-000-141 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-07-27 |
Mauritius: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Mauritius charges an export tax on sugar |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Mauritius reported that taxes were eliminated in 2004 |
|
|
NTB-000-103 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-07-26 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Namibia imposed export levies on live animals, hides and skins . |
|
|
NTB-000-277 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-09-08 |
Rwanda: Ministry of Trade |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2011-10-27 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Export levies of 15% is charged on unprocessed goat hides |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Rwanda hs lifted the ban on exportation of raw hides and skins. However, the 5th EAC regional forum on NTBs held from 1-3 Septmber 2011 noted that the ban was appllied by all EAC countries with the aim to encourage value addition on raw hides towards export. |
|
|
NTB-000-228 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-07-28 |
South Africa: Ministry of Trade |
Botswana |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
In South Africa, Minister can impose export tax under the Livestock and meat industries Act |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
South Africa reported that this act is in Botswana not SA. SA has an ‘Animal Health Act and the Meat Safety Act’, there are no export taxes under this act. |
|
|
NTB-000-648 |
5.3. Export taxes Policy/Regulatory |
2014-12-11 |
Uganda: Uganda Revenue Authority |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2015-11-18 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Charge of "export tax" of 0.2 % of raw materials exported from Uganda by Rwanda Premier Tobacco Company Ltd |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
At the 16th EAC Forum on NTBs, Uganda undertook to study evidence provided by Rwanda and report back to the next meeting of the forum. UGANDA is adhering to EAC preferential treatment. |
|
|
NTB-001-065 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2022-04-01 |
Botswana: Ministry of Finance |
South Africa |
Resolved 2023-10-05 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana government is about to introduce the Tax Stamps on all imported products and that would affect the South African Wine Industry. The Tax Stamp imposition has been confirmed by the Botswana Minister of Finance and they have appointed the Service Provide that would conduct a Research. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The NTB BW NCP has provided the legal instruments gazetted by the BW Government on the matter. |
|
|
NTB-000-099 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-26 |
Botswana: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana has single marketing channel for maize |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Botswana reported that she has multi channel maize marketing. Ministry of Agriculture issue import permits to ensure balance between local sourcing and importation. |
|
|
NTB-000-097 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-26 |
Botswana: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2020-03-13 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Botswana reported that the BMC Act is under review by Ministry of Agriculture to allow entry of other players. |
|
|
NTB-000-097 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-26 |
Botswana: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2020-03-13 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
On 13 March 2020, Botswana Focal Point reported that the Botswana Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food Security was in the process of establishing a meat regulator that will oversee import and export of meat products including beef. A regulation was issued late 2019 repealing the clause on the Botswana Meat Commission (BMC) Act that gave BMC the mandate as the sole exporter of cattle and its edible products, and instead mandated the Minister of Agricultural Development and Food Security to consider applications for any person wishing to export beef and its products. |
|
|
NTB-000-096 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-26 |
Botswana: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana has single channeling marketing for wheat. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Botswana reported that she does not have a single marketing channel for wheat. |
|
|
NTB-000-098 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-26 |
Botswana: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Botswana has single marketing channel for dairy |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Botswana reported that there is free entry of other players. It is not restrictive |
|
|
NTB-000-102 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-26 |
Mauritius: Ministry of Agriculture |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Mauritius has single marketing channel for agricultural products |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Mauritius reported that she is a net food importer and therefore state regulated agencies are necessary to coordinate food imports into that country for food security purposes |
|
|
NTB-000-071 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-23 |
South Africa: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Raw sugar can only be exported through a single channel |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
South Africa reported that all excess raw sugar is exported by SASA on behalf of producers simply to safeguard on logistical costs etc to minimize the distortive effects of the world market. The manner in which it is done in SA does not conform to what is normally referred to as single channel - the implications of single channel can be much broader. |
|
|
NTB-000-072 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-23 |
South Africa: Ministry of Trade |
Malawi |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
South African Government has monopoly in the trading of basic food commodities. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
South Africa reported that apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of Basic Food Commodities in South Africa. |
|
|
NTB-000-073 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-23 |
South Africa: Ministry of Trade |
Malawi |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
South African government has monopoly on trade in Tea |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
South Africa reported that the applied tariff rate for tea imported from SADC countries is zero. Apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of tea in South Africa. |
|
|
NTB-000-074 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-23 |
South Africa: Ministry of Trade |
Malawi |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
South African Government has monopoly on trade in tobacco |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
South Afric areported that the applied tariff rate for tobacco imported from SADC countries is zero. Apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of tobacco in South Africa. |
|
|
NTB-000-126 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-26 |
Eswatini: Ministry of Trade |
Eswatini |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Single channel marketing for sugar and sugar products. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Swaziland reported that the status quo remains because the Sugar Act has not been reviewed. |
|
|
NTB-000-101 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2009-07-26 |
Zimbabwe: Ministry of Agriculture |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Zimbabwe has single marketing channel for basic commodities. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Zimbabwe reported that this is no longer obtaining. |
|
|
NTB-000-546 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2010-09-01 |
Zimbabwe: Harare offices |
Zimbabwe |
Resolved 2016-08-24 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Zimbabwe has too many agencies issuing agricultural Permits, thereby giving problems to those who would want to obtain them, for example you have to go to gugunyana offices then you go to Mazowe Plant and Quarantine offices then also you have to go to AMA (agricultural marketing authority) this process we feel its too long why cant it be done under one roof, or one just live your application then the move around into different offices is done within the office bearers |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Zimbabwe reported that most of the issues are of policy nature therefore awareness programmes with relevant stakeholders and government agencies will be undertaken . |
|
|
NTB-001-002 |
1.2. Government monopoly in export/import |
2021-01-27 |
Zambia: Kariba |
Zimbabwe |
Resolved 2021-01-30 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Zambia Revenue Authority has produced a statutory Instrument (SI NO 115 OF 2020 which prohibits exportation of certain products to neighboring countries e.g Zimbabwe. Trade has been going on well between Zimbabwe and Zambia without challenges and if there was need for commodities to exported or imported with license or permits traders have been abiding as required by Law. Zambia Revenue Authority Kariba is holding trucks intended to cross to Zimbabwe for clearance because of this Statutory Instrument, The statutory Instrument is not clear on the reasons or basis for its effect, It has come harder for the traders as the situation will force them to use chirundu which will then be costly for them to drive back to chirundu, whereas those goods in trucks which are in Zambia have been pre cleared in Zimbabwe awaiting PE as the normal way . |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The Zambia Revenue Authority facilitated the clearance of the consignments that were already at Kariba Border Post. Importers/Exporters/Transporters were urged to be guided by the Statutory Instrument on the routes they are required to use when carrying certain cargo.
Due to the nature of the current situation, those already at Kariba were allowed to proceed. |
|
|
Products:
|
1905.3: - Sweet biscuits; waffles and wafers :, 0401: Milk and cream, not concentrated nor containing added sugar or other sweetening matter. and 34: CHAPTER 34 - SOAP, ORGANIC SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS, WASHING PREPARATIONS, LUBRICATING PREPARATIONS, ARTIFICIAL WAXES, PREPARED WAXES, POLISHING OR SCOURING PREPARATIONS, CANDLES AND SIMILAR ARTICLES, MODELLING PASTES, ‘DENTAL WAXES’ AND DENTAL PREPARATIONS |
|