Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 21 to 40 of 855

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-388	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2011-01-30	EAC	Tanzania	Resolved 2014-05-15	View
Complaint:	There are too many roadblocks along the major hoghways in EAC partner states. Too many stops points (police check points ) that cause unnessary delay of goods from ports to various destinations in the partner states.
Resolution status note:	On 15th May 2014, Kenya Focal Points reported that this NTB had been resolved. KRA abolished the requirement of Cash bonds as recommended by the EAC regional forum on NTBs and Council . What is required and applied is a general bond . Therefore the NTB should be recorded as resolved.
NTB-000-435	2.14. Other	2010-09-16	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	Lack of implementation of EAC harmonized documents by partner states.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th NTBs forum held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that Partner States are now using EAC harmonized documents. This NTB is therefore resolved
NTB-000-436	2.14. Other	2009-04-16	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	There is lack of harmonized procedures manual for the EAC partner states.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th NTBs forum held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that the EAC harmonized procedures manual was adopted by the Council in 2012. This NTB is therefore resolved
NTB-000-437	8.8. Issues related to transit	2010-05-12	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2015-09-24	View
Complaint:	Delays in transit bonds cancellation by EAC partner states
Resolution status note:	Now with the introduction of the Single Customs Territory using a single bond from the port up to final destination, the issue has been addressed.
NTB-000-438	1.1. Export subsidies A9: SPS measures n.e.s.	2009-09-16	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2016-06-30	View
Complaint:	Numerous institutions involved in testing goods in the EAC partner states.
Resolution status note:	There is collaboration among testing agencies
NTB-000-446	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2011-09-03	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2015-09-24	View
Complaint:	Port Charges are not harmonized. Port charges should be benchmarked with international port charges
Resolution status note:	Kenya and URT submitted the Port procedures manual to the EAC Secretariat.
NTB-000-447	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2011-09-03	EAC	Rwanda	Resolved 2016-06-30	View
Complaint:	Customs working hours are not harmonized
Resolution status note:	Customs working hours have been harmonized by OSBPs
NTB-000-697	1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions	2009-07-16			Resolved 2019-08-21	View
Complaint:	Lack of coordination among the numerous institutions involved in testing and clearance of goods at the Borders
Resolution status note:	.The NTBs meeting of Focal Points held on 19- 21 August 2019 was informed that the EAC agreed to harmonise the operations of their institutions. This NTB no longer was resolved in the EAC Time Bound mechanism.
NTB-000-448	8.8. Issues related to transit	2011-09-02	EAC	Rwanda	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	Inadequate Police Escort mechanism.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th EAC regional forum on non tariff barriers held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that the All Partner States were providing police escorts. This NTB is therefore resolved
NTB-000-449	7.3. Corruption	2011-06-16	EAC	Rwanda	Resolved 2016-06-30	View
Complaint:	Corruption along the Northern and Central Corridors (police roadblocks, weighbridge and border gates.
Resolution status note:	This NTB is no longer obtaining .
NTB-000-450	2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure	2011-09-03	EAC	Uganda	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	There is lack of verification sheds and parking yards at most border posts in the EAC partner states.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th NTBs forum held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that the 15th EAC Forum on NTBs noted that the ongoing construction of OBSP was addressing this NTB and Partner states reported that construction of OSBPs was at advanced stages at key border posts. This NTB is therefore resolved
NTB-000-456	1.1. Export subsidies A83: Certification requirement	2011-09-03	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	EAC Standards Bureaus have varying procedures for issuance of certification marks, inspection and testing.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th NTBs forum held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that Partner States Regulatory Agencies are collaborating in clearance of goods and that there is now mutual recognition of certificates issued by Partner States Testing bodies. This NTB was therefore resolved.
NTB-000-486	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2012-02-15	SADC	South Africa	Resolved 2013-05-23	View
Complaint:	We are a South African Transport Company transporting goods into DRC. We are paying on weekly basis exorbitant road duties in Botswana, Zambia, and Zimbabwe & DRC if we offload loads from Johannesburg RSA to Mutanda DRC. Our cost on a tri-axle on road fee is 1060 Pula on return trip (Martinsdrif to Kazangula and back), insurance 50P for 3 months and then about 100 Pula on a yearly level also. Zambia insurance 300 000KW for year, then toll fee for 285USD on return trip Kazangula to DRC border and back, 200 000KW carbon tax, 70 000KW for extra toll fees on road. Zimbabwe insurance 170USD for year, the 100USD on toll fees, then coupons another 10USD and environmental cost depends on the load and weight up to 160USD & 90USD carbon 3 months. Going into the DRC, border customs parking 133USD, entry fee and costing 350USD, 300USD PEAGE, 4x 150USD for toll fees going to Mutanda and coming back. None of the foreign trucks from DRC, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana or Namibia pay this cost when entering South Africa. We drive on the roads to supply clients with goods, we provide a service, the same as for the foreign transporters, but they don't pay similarly high costs when entering South Africa. We need an explanation from the countries listed above as to why is this done. At the moment, we give to a driver for one load going to DRC from JHB, 2400USD, 2500 PULA & R5000 to cover these expenses and we cannot increase our rates easily, without risking losing our clients. What can be done about this situation?
Resolution status note:	Focal Points from Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe reported the current standard official charges and argued that these are in accordance established regional protocols. At the 11th meeting of the SADC Sub -Committee on Trade Facilitation held on 23 May 2013, South Africa focal point requested that the NTB be considered non actionable as they could not trace the complainant. However, the NTB is considered resolved as it does not fall under the ' non actionable' category of complaints.
NTB-000-499	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2012-03-14		Tanzania	Resolved 2022-06-14	View
Complaint:	Non-harmonized road user charges / road tolls in EAC Partner States.
Resolution status note:	On 14 June 2022 the EAC Secretariat reported that the SCTIFI meeting agreed that this is not an NTB since RUC is not harmonized in all EAC Partner States. The complaint is removed from the TBP
NTB-000-507	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2012-03-14	EAC	Kenya	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	Lack of recognition of CTH criteria in the EAC Rules of Origin for motor vehicles by Tanzania, Uganda and Rwanda
Resolution status note:	At the 16th NTBs forum held in Kigali in December 2014, EAC Secretariat reported that Partner States are now recognizing EAC rules of origin. This NTB is therefore resolved.
NTB-000-634	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2013-11-12	EAC	Egypt	Resolved 2016-02-08	View
Complaint:	Egypt's National Monitoring Committee received a complaint from Chemicals and Fertilizers Exporting Company that the cost of shipment between Egypt and the eastern countries in Africa is very high. In addition east African countries prefer that the shipment companies ship fruits rather than chemicals. And hence a suggestion was made to hold a meeting between transport syndicates especially of the landlocked countries in COMESA and the business community in an attempt to reach a solution. please consider the above mentioned suggestion.
Resolution status note:	On 8th February 2016, Egypt Focal point reported that the NTB be considered closed on the basis that Egypt's National Monitoring Committee did not receive any details from the Exporting Company.
NTB-000-698	2.14. Other Policy/Regulatory	2014-07-23			Resolved 2017-05-06	View
Complaint:	Border management institutions’ working hours are not harmonized.
Resolution status note:	At the 23rd EAC NTBs Forum held from 4- 6 May 2017, Partner States reported that the border operating hours had been harmonised
NTB-000-737	7.4. Costly procedures	2017-03-01		South Africa	Resolved 2019-08-21	View
Complaint:	KBP company who constructed the new border between Zambia and DRC , about 6 years or so ago pegged crossing fees at $100/truck for the Zambia side and $100 for DRC side. The same charge is levied for the return journey therefore transporters pay total crossing fees of $400/truck for a round trip .Further , parking fees of $25/truck/day are enforced for units that stay over 24 hours in the parking bay. These fees were justified at the beginning as these were to modernize the border. However, the transport rates have tumbled by as much as 40 % and we all now have to look at cutting costs. Taking into account the number of vehicle crossings daily, the US$ 400 crossing fees per round trip has now become a barrier to trade and is having an impact on growth in trade in the region.
Resolution status note:	During the meeting of NTBs Focal Points held on 19- 21 August 2019, Zambia reported the charges are part of the contractual obligations which will expire in 2023.
NTB-000-800	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2017-11-01			Resolved 2019-10-15	View
Complaint:	Lack of preferential treatment to Cerelac product manufactured in Kenya and exported into Tanzania on the basis that Kenya via Legal Notice No.EAC/70/2017 was granted stay application of CET in respect to raw sugar. EAC Legal Notice No.EAC/70/2017 granted Kenya duty remission on raw sugar not a stay. For a company to import, it has to follow due process of gazettement. So far no company has applied, no DRS application received and no company has been gazetted to import raw sugar.
Resolution status note:	The Regional Monitoring Committee held on 15th October, 2019 agreed that the NTB was resolved.
NTB-000-805	Existence of several weighbridge stations in the central and Northern corridors.	2014-04-01	EAC	EAC	Resolved 2019-08-21	View
Complaint:	Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi are affected by the existence of several weighbridge stations in the central and Northern corridors (Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda).
Resolution status note:	During the meeting of Focal Points held on 19- 21 August 2019 , EAC NTBs Focal Points reported that this matter had been resolved. The weigh bridges have been reduced to 3 in the central corridor .

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5...41 42 43 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints