Active complaints

Showing items 61 to 80 of 80
Complaint number NTB Type
Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments
Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures
Category 5. Specific limitations
Category 6. Charges on imports
Category 7. Other procedural problems
Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding
Check allUncheck all
Date of incident Location
COMESA
EAC
SADC
Reporting country or region
COMESA
EAC
SADC
Status
Actions
NTB-000-358 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2010-02-10 Democratic Republic of the Congo: Ministry of Trade Tanzania In process View
Complaint: The process of obtaining DRC Ogeframe certificate delays cargo at the port and increases costs. Procedure is too long as it involves exporter paying fees at Tanzania Revenue Authority in DAr es Salaam Office and then take the document for endorsement by DRC. This is applicable only to transit goods to DRC.  
Progress: At the 18th SADC Sub Committee on Trade Facilitation meeting held in Gaborone, Tanzania informed the meeting that it was the DRC companies that experienced the NTB, however, DRC responded that they had not received any complaint from the companies . The two countries would undertake bilateral consultations between the Ministries of Transport and Ministries of Trade and report back.  
NTB-000-703 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2015-11-10 Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: Single Customs Territory (SCT) export documents processing in Tanzania are taking longer up to 10 days to be cleared instead of 3 days.
 
Progress: The 21st EAC NTBs Regional Forum held in Nairobi recommended that URT consults with their National Standing Committee on SCT and report back during the next meeting.

URT reported that there has been improvement and days for processing the documents have reduced. URT requested Kenya to provide specific cases affected by this NTB so as to enable follow-up. It was reported that generally consignments with correct documentation are cleared on time.

However, Kenya reported that the delays are still ongoing. Manufacturers are still being charged exhobitant fees ($300). Kenya submitted evidence of specific cases at the time of reporting the NTB.

Kenya will resubmit the evidences earlier submitted to the Secretariat including new evidence.
 
NTB-000-775 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2017-05-05 Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: It takes more than 14 days to resolve complaints relating to uplifting of invoice values where TRA officers decide to increase the value of the goods. This should take a maximum of two days to complete the process.  
Progress: In June, 2017 Tanzania reported that she considers that uplifting of value is not an NTB because valuation is done according to agreed customs valuation and it is done to all importers irrespective of the producers and country of origin.

The NTB was discussed during the Bilateral meeting between Kenya and URT that was held in September, 2017 and the PSs agreed that if Kenya has specific issues it can be easily raised and addressed between the KRA/TRA on case by case basis.
 
NTB-000-783 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2017-09-19 Zimbabwe: Beitbridge South Africa In process View
Complaint: Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) is not adhering to their new procedure for handling transit cargo thereby causing serious delays in clearance of trucks at the Beitbridge border post.
Truckers are experiencing serious delays because ZIMRA is not adhering to the procedure it stipulated in its communication documents. ALL transit cargo is being fitted with seals, despite the cargo already being sealed by client at loading point. Communication from drivers indicated that, currently only 5 trucks being sealed per day.
Trucks then going onto a "list" for transit escort. This is despite the official communication stipulating that ONLY trucks carrying cargo that is not covered by a suitable tent/tarpaulin that cannot be sealed will be considered by authorities to be escorted.
Truck is a tautliner and thus can be sealed yet driver has been informed it needs to be escorted, and he was informed that 5 trucks per day are escorted to Chirundu. Currently he is number 48 in the "list". This goes against what was communicated in ZIMRA informational document.
Our trucks have Route Risk Assessment done prior for the reasons stated by another complainant, yet ZIMRA wants to dictate which roads and routes to use. This procedure is causing unnecessary delays at the border.
 
NTB-000-657 5.15. Other
Policy/Regulatory
2014-12-11 Tanzania: Various State Agencies EAC In process View
Complaint: Numerous monetary charges required by various agencies in the United Republic of Tanzania on exports of dairy products  
Progress: At the 16th EAC NTBs Forum held in Kigali, noted that the SCTIFI urged Partner States to forward charges on dairy products to the EAC Secretariat in order to work modalities to harmonize them. The Secretariat informed the meeting that it was only the Republic of Kenya and Rwanda who had submitted their charges. The meeting recommended the other Partner States to submit their charges by 31st December, 2014. The time frame for addressing this issue is June 2015.  
NTB-000-714 6.7. Other
Policy/Regulatory
2016-06-30 Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drug Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: TFDA registers injectables as per pack size and treats each product by itself rendering retaining licences for the product very expensive.  
Progress: At the 21st meeting of the EAC Regional Forum on NTBs, Tanzania undertook to investigate and report back  
NTB-000-766 5.13. Other quantity control measures
Policy/Regulatory
2017-05-05 Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: Intellectual property infringement. Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority requires manufactures to disclose recipe or formulae which is an intellectual property so as to approve or register products.  
NTB-000-745 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 2017-01-19 Zambia: Kazungula Ferry South Africa In process View
Complaint: “SARS received an escalation in January 2017 from Deloitte, regarding a complaint by fuel exporters from South Africa. The complaint is regarding Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) Circular No. 9 of December 2016, notifying its officers “that all fuel imported from South Africa under preferential arrangements should be subjected to payments of a monetary deposit equivalent to the full customs duty payable.

The modalities of collection of the said deposit will be temporarily suspending both SSA and SDC preferential rates against goods of HS 2710.12.10 and 2710.19.10 until the Origin verification process is finalised”.

SARs is of the view that the collection of the monetary deposits on fuel imported from South Africa is against the spirit of the SADC Protocol on Trade and the WTO, as this treatment applies only to oil imported from South Africa. It pre-supposes that the ZRA is nullifying the SADC Protocol on Trade relating to those specific products without following the proper procedures regarding derogation on infant industries.

SARs has tried several times to get answers from Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) to explain their reasoning behind the circular and so far, they have not provided any correspondence to this matter.
 
Progress: 1. On 25th January 2018, Zambia Focal Point reported that the deposit was a temporal measure pending origin inquiry. The inquiry has reached advanced stage and will soon be concluded and stakeholders will be fully advised on the way forward. This is consistent with the provisions of the protocol on trade which allow for collection of such deposits where necessary, while origin verification is underway.

2. During the 15th meeting of the SADC Sub Committee on Trade facilitation held in may 2017, Zambia reported that consultations will be undertaken with relevant authorities and report back.
 
NTB-000-033 5.10. Prohibitions 2008-12-22 Uganda: Ministry of Rourism, Trade and Industry Kenya In process View
Complaint: Ban on Imports

Kenya has complained that Uganda had placed a ban on beef imports
 
Progress: 1. During the Extra Ordinary SCTIFI that sat in February, 2018 Uganda reported that that they have made significant efforts towards resolving this NTB and is still in process of resolving it. Kenya is looking forward for a final commitment to lift the ban.
2. The Dedicated Session of the Permanent/ Principal/Under Secretaries and Cabinet Secretary of Trade and EAC Affairs held in Kampala to deliberate on how to resolve these NTBs Dedicated Session recommended that the NTB be finalised during the Ministerial Meeting in November, 2017 in Arusha.

3. A bilateral meeting was held between Kenya and Uganda between 29th– 30th October, 2015 and among others deliberated on this NTB and agreed that the issue be eventually resolved pending submission of documents on amended laws on fulfillment of conditions for control of bovine and other import diseases into Kenya, by Kenyan authorities to the Ugandan High Commission in Kenya for onward transmission to Uganda government "

4. On 11th September 2014, COMESA Secretariat reported that COMESA had engaged Uganda on this issue but the status still remained the same. Earlier in April 2014, COMESA Secretariat had also suggested that this NTB be addressed within the EAC arrangement. EAC focal points are therefore expected to take this issue up at the next NTBs Ministerial Forum.
5. The NTBs Ministerial Forum urged the Republic of Kenya to review the legal notice No. 69 to address the issues of the BSE disease by December 30th, 2012.
 
Products: 0202.30: Frozen, boneless meat of bovine animals  
NTB-000-820 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures
A12: Geographical restrictions on eligibility
Policy/Regulatory
2010-12-01 Zambia: Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Kenya In process View
Complaint: Brookside Dairy Ltd of Kenya, exports of UHT milk are denied entry into Zambia for reasons that, an inspection audit of the source of milk, export facility, milk product and relevant standards in use in Kenya by the Zambian authorities raised sanitary concerns pointing out that Zambia cannot accept milk products from the raw milk that did not meet the Zambian milk standard. The Zambian standard on raw milk for use in production of milk products is a maximum of 200,000 colon forming units (cfu) whereas Kenya legislation allows for a maximum of 2, 000,000 cfu in raw milk used in making UHT milk, which is above the 200,000 cfu allowed in Zambia. Kenya applies the EAC graded standards which allow for a maximum of 2,000,000 cfu and a minimum of 200,000 cfu and below for raw milk.  
Progress: Various bilateral meetings and technical audits have been undertaken between the two countries in an attempt to resolve the NTB. The thirty-Third Meeting of the COMESA Trade and Customs Committee held on 15-17 September 2017 recommended that :
i) COMESA should harmonize SPS measures through implementation of the COMESA Green Pass (CGP) to facilitate trade in agricultural products.
ii) Member States should adhere to the NTB resolution time frames set out in the COMESA Regulations on Elimination of NTBs to ensure timely resolution of NTBs and enhance intra-regional trade.
 
NTB-000-653 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT)
B15: Registration requirement for importers for TBT reasons
Policy/Regulatory
2014-12-11 Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: Requirement by Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority for companies exporting to URT to register, re-label, and retesting of certified EAC products exported by other Partner States Reported in 2003.  
Progress: 1. During the Bilateral meeting between Kenya and Tanzania held on 27th - 31st January, 2018 in Mombasa, Kenya, Tanzania reported that they recognise quality marks on products from other EAC Partner States and committed to ratify the EAC SPS Protocol by June, 2018.
The meeting agreed that TFDA and KEBS conduct a verification mission on 28th February – 2nd March 2018.

2.The Dedicated Session of the Permanent/ Principal/Under Secretaries and Cabinet Secretary of Trade and EAC Affairs held in Kampala to deliberate on how to resolve these NTBs Dedicated Session recommended that the United Republic of Tanzania expedites the Ratification of the SPS Protocol and that the United Republic of Tanzania Mutually recognizes quality marks from other EAC Partner States as provided for in the SPS Protocol.

3. Partner States’ Standards bureaus should give mutual recognition of quality marks issued by competent authorities in Partner States. The TFDA should eliminate its requirement that companies exporting to URT should re-register, re-label and retest their products.

4. The 16th EAC NTBs Forum held in Kigali noted that the 18th meeting of the East African Standards Committees held in 2014 deliberated on the NTB and:

i) urged TBS to adopt all the harmonized EAC Standards to ensure that there are no barriers arising from the Standards; and

ii) requested TFDA to carry out a review on food product safety control systems in other Partner States for the purpose of creating confidence and facilitating trade within the EAC region and report back to the Committee by June 2015.
 
NTB-000-742 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT)
B1: Prohibitions/restrictions of imports for objectives set out in the TBT agreement
2017-02-20 Uganda: Port Bell Lake port South Africa In process View
Complaint: Verification Agencies (SGS) apply standards that are higher than International accepted standards requiring additional tests and certificates which is of high costs. Additional tests include tests for copper, iron, manganese, lead and coliforms which are expensive tests adding to the costs of doing business. The additional tests last for a week in addition to the export process. The Agency offers Route B or C product registration. Product meant for Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda are tested once a year Route C is a security factory audit for wine export to the abovementioned countries  
Progress: This matter was brought to the attention of the Uganda Focal Points along the margins of the 23rd EAC NTBs forum on 6 May 2017 . Uganda private sector Focal Point reported that consultations had been initiated with the Ministry of Trade , Industry and cooperatives to try and resolve the matter amicably. They will provide feedback in due course .  
NTB-000-811 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT)
B11: Prohibition for TBT reasons
Policy/Regulatory
2017-10-02 Kenya: State Department of Trade Rwanda In process View
Complaint: Kenya banned exports of scrap metals destined to Rwanda in accordance with scrap metal Act NO. 1 OF 2015  
Progress: During the meeting of the SCTIFI that took place in November, 2017 Kenya reported that there was no enough evidence that Rwanda was being denied to trade in scrap metal by Kenya. The Scrap Metal Act No. 1 of 2015 has exemptions that can be used in this type of trade. This should be considered resolved.  
NTB-000-818 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT)
B42: TBT regulations on transport and storage
2018-05-17 SADC SADC New View
Complaint: Failure to implement Article 5.8 (6.2 Road Traffic Policy) leading to variable treatment of the transport of High Cube containers with height exceeding 4.3 metres.

The transport of High Cube Containers, on “standard” deck height (1.5 metres) vehicles and trailers results in overall height of approximately 4.5 metres.
Botswana: Imposes requirement for abnormal load permits for each load.
South Africa threatens to repeal moratorium on prosecution from 1 Jan 2019
Other countries ignoring “illegal” height, but “illegality” leaves insurance threats to operators.
Zambia (4.8), Zimbabwe 4.65), Malawi (4.6); Tanzania (4.6) have increased legal height to at least 4.6 metres.
Uncertainty in region is causing growing concerns regarding viability of international transport routes amid fears of further enforcement costs and barriers.
 
NTB-000-520 6.5. Variable levies
Policy/Regulatory
2012-06-20 Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: Beef and Pork from Kenya Farmers Choice are being charged 25% by Tanzania because the company is in the duty remission scheme despite the products not benefiting from the duty remission scheme.  
Progress: 1. On 5 December 2013, Kenya FocalPoint reported that the bilateral meeting failed to resolve this issue.

2. During the 7th EAC Regional Forum on NTBs held on 27th – 29th June 2012, Kampala, Kenya reported that the products being exported to Tanzania do not benefit from the duty remission scheme. The meeting recommended that the issue be deliberated upon during the bilateral meeting between Kenya and Tanzania scheduled for 21-22 Augustt 2012.
 
NTB-000-758 6.5. Variable levies
Policy/Regulatory
2017-05-05 Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: Tanzania Revenue Authority imposes a Weights and measures levy at 2% of the customs value for every export. The levy is not being picked on the customs entries as is the norm but on a different collection sheet raising questions on authenticity of the levy.  
Progress: During the Extra Ordinary meeting of the SCTIFI that sat in Februay, 2018, Tanzania reported that she will look into the matter in the context of regional harmonization of all fees.  
NTB-000-780 6.5. Variable levies 2017-07-28 Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority Tanzania In process View
Complaint: TFDA (Tanzania Foods & Drugs Authority) imposes a 1% fees on FOB value on all imports (food, drugs & cosmetics) including the ones coming from Zanzibar which is part of the United Republic of Tanzania. The ZFDB (Zanzibar Food & Drugs Board) does the same thing as they are trained by TFDA. This is badly hurting local and regional trade as well as local manufacturers.  
NTB-000-821 6.5. Variable levies
Policy/Regulatory
2017-02-21 Zambia: Zambia Revenue Authority Kenya In process View
Complaint: On 20th and 21st February 2017, Zimbabwean and Kenyan companies involved in distribution of tilapia into Zambia reported that the Government of Zambia had enacted the Customs and Excise Amendment Act number 47 of 2016 effective 1 January 2017.The amendment imposes a surtax of 5% on all imported goods that are produced or manufactured in Zambia. The surtax was meant to encourage local sourcing of inputs for the manufacturing sector in order to reduce the cost of production.  
Progress: During the 33rd meeting of the COMESA Customs and Trade Committee, it was noted that Zambia private sector had lobbied for imposition of surtax on locally produced inputs, however there was a blanket application of the surtax covering inputs not locally produced and finished products as a way of raising revenue for the government.

 
NTB-000-670 8.6. Vehicle standards 2015-05-08 Tanzania: Tunduma In process View
Complaint: Despite the passing and acceptance of EAC Vehicle Overload Bill of 2012, whereby it states under the Fourth Schedule s.5 (1) (c) - VEHICLE DIMENSIONS, AXLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS AND VEHICLE COMBINATIONS, that the maximum vehicle combination length permissible is 22 m and which includes and covers the South African designed and developed Interlink combination of 22 m maximum. Tanzania are still insisting on abnormal vehicle permits to be issued to these vehicles on entry into Tanzania at Tunduma Border Post at a cost of US $20 per entry or face heavy penalties including the impounding of vehicles if they are not in posesion of an abnormal permit.

This is in breach of the Bill which has been accepted by all EAC Member Countries including Tanzania and this policy needs to be revoked ASAP.
 
NTB-000-689 8.6. Vehicle standards 2016-03-23 Botswana: All Border posts or entry points into Botswana by road In process View
Complaint: We have a problem in Botswana regarding the determination of Road User Charges at the border posts into Botswana.

The trailer manufacturers states the GVM to be 36 000 kg per unit (see attached vehicle registration papers)

This is the combined weight of the front and back link. However that is not what is reflected on the disc.

What it should say on the disc, is that the carrying capacity:

a) on the front link is 13000 kg.
b) The rear link is 23000kg.
c) The combined weight is thus 36 000kg.

We all know that it is not possible to carry 36000kgs on the front link and 36000kgs on the rear link. The axle configurations do not permit this to say the very least.

The problem arises on entry into Botswana at the border posts. They charge their road user fees per disc weight on the front and rear trailer.

therefore we end up paying for 36000kgs for the front trailer and 36000kgs for the rear trailer, this is 72 000kgs per unit.

To change the SA disc the following procedure will have to be followed.

1) W/bridge
2) Road worthy
3) Registration certificate
4) Certificate of compliance
5) Certificate model
6) Builders certificate
7) Ten days to change details of GVM per trailer.

a) It is very costly
b) it is very time consuming
c) it is not practical
d) It defeats the object of standardization and harmonization in the SADC region.

In this day and age where we are all trying to tighten our belts in order to survive, we can ill afford such additional costs.

This matter requires the urgent intervention of the focal point group in Botswana to address this matter urgently with the Roads Department in Gaborone, all relevant documentation pertaining to this case has been attached.
 
Progress: This issue was discussed during the Botswana / South Africa Bi-National Commission, which was held in Gaborone in November 2017. As per item 3.2.2.1 bullet point number one (1), the Republic of South Africa was to formerly request for a waiver from Botswana on the matter, while South Africa is still sorting out the system that causes the problem. Botswana is still awaiting correspondence from South Africa to that effect. We kindly advice the South African Focal Point to consult the Department of Transport in South Africa for further clarifications.  
1 2 3 4 Next >>