| Complaint number |
NTB Type
Check allUncheck all |
Date of incident |
Location |
Reporting country or region (additional) |
Status |
Actions |
|
NTB-000-680 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory |
2015-09-04 |
Tanzania: Namanga |
Kenya |
Resolved 2016-04-29 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
General Motors East Africa sold some vehicles to its dealer in Tanzania which vehicles were charged duty, despite the provisions of the rules of origin which qualify vehicles assembled from CKD as local products and should be sold free of duty within EAC. The Rules of Origin were gazette on the 23rd day of January 2015 and they are fully operational. This is a clear violation of the EAC Rules of Origin. Copies of the EAC Certificate of Origin, the Commercial invoice, the Import Duty Assessment Document & the Import Duty Payment Note for four vehicles that were charged duty at the Namanga border are available for scrutiny if required. We sought an explanation from the Tanzania Revenue Authority but they have not given a substantial explanation except that, in their opinion the rules take effect from October this year |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The new EAC rules became fully operational in Tanzania at the end of April 2016 and the the operational manuals were circulated to all borders. The vehicles qualifies for preferential treatment under the new rules. This issue was considered resolved during EAC 20th NTBs Forum |
|
|
NTB-000-701 |
6.5. Variable levies Policy/Regulatory |
2015-07-15 |
Tanzania: Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment |
Kenya |
Resolved 2017-10-24 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
United Republic of Tanzania has introduced a railway development levy of 1.5 per cent for imports from Kenya.
Reported in 2015. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The EAC NTBs Focal Point reported that the NTB had been resolved by the meeting of the Dedicate Session of Senior Officials held in Kampala from 21st - 24th October 2017 |
|
|
NTB-000-702 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin |
2015-09-17 |
Tanzania: National Environment Management |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2018-05-12 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Delays in issuance of certificates by Tanzania’s NEMA (National Environmental management Authority) which has the validity for three months. It also takes three months to renew the certificate that allows Bralirwa Ltd to export broken glasses and bottles to Dar es Salaam to be recycled by KIOO Ltd.
Reported in 2015.
|
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the 25th EAC NTBs Forum held on 9- 12 May 2018, URT and Rwanda reported that this issue hadbeen resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-703 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures |
2015-11-10 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-11-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Single Customs Territory (SCT) export documents processing in Tanzania are taking longer up to 10 days to be cleared instead of 3 days. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the SCTIFI in November, 2018, the meeting was informed that TRA requires a Bonded Transportation document (BT) to control movement of cargo. Currently, there is no linkage between the BT and the exit note. TRA ICT experts are expected to resolve the matter by 9th November 2018. The meeting agreed that this is a single customs territory (SCT) matter and not an NTB. Hence the NTB was Resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-709 |
2.2. Arbitrary customs classification |
2016-04-01 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-07-05 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Arbitrary uplifting of value exports of the Air filters for internal Combustion manufactured by Kenafric products leading to high charges on VAT |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The Secretariat reported that this NTB had been resolved by the report of the bilateral meeting held from 3rd -5th July 2018 between Kenya & Tanzania . |
|
|
NTB-000-710 |
2.14. Other Policy/Regulatory |
2016-04-01 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2017-10-24 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
TRA offices close earlier (3.00 pm) than KRA Office hindering the Verification at Inland Container Deport (ICD) Nairobi |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The Dedicated Session of Senior Officials meeting held in October, 2017 reported that both countries Kenya and Tanzania have harmonised the working hours. Hence the NTB is resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-712 |
2.6. Additional taxes and other charges |
2016-06-30 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2016-12-07 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
A Kenyan Exhibitor for the 40th Dar es Salaam International Tradefair charged duties on goods by TFDA and TRA. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The 22nd Meeting of the EAC NTBs Forum held in December 2016 accepted Tanzania report that this was a once off incidence and that adequate arrangements had been put in pace to facilitate clearance of exhibitors goods during trade fair. |
|
|
NTB-000-714 |
6.7. Other Policy/Regulatory |
2016-06-30 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drug Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-08-21 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
TFDA registers injectables as per pack size and treats each product by itself rendering retaining licences for the product very expensive. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the meeting of the NTBs Focal Points held on 19- 21 August 2019, Tanzania reported that the Bilateral meeting between Kenya and Tanzania held in December 2018, agreed that each country should to continue charging their domestic fees until when the process of harmonization is completed. Immediate implementation. The meeting called on the EAC Secretariat to facilitate the harmonization of food safety standards in the region. |
|
|
NTB-000-715 |
2.6. Additional taxes and other charges Policy/Regulatory |
2016-06-30 |
Tanzania: Ministry of Envinronment |
Kenya |
Resolved 2016-12-06 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Tanzania authority requires that heat treated wooden pallets be fumigated again at the Border, failure of which they charge penalties. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
At the 22nd EAC NTB Forum held in December 2016, Kenya reported that Tanzania Revenue Authority had lifted the requirement that heat treated wooden pallets be
fumigated again at the Border, failure of which they charge penalties. |
|
|
NTB-000-757 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-05-12 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Long lead time to confirm paid taxes; for exports into Tanzania once entries have been lodged and taxes paid, it takes 1 week for Tanzania Revenue Authority to confirm that taxes have been paid. The process of confirmation is supposed to take 1 day. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
The 25th EAC NTBs Forum held from 9-12 May 2018,was informed that this matter had been resolved by the bilateral meeting between URT and Kenya. |
|
|
NTB-000-758 |
6.5. Variable levies Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-11-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Tanzania Revenue Authority imposes a Weights and measures levy at 2% of the customs value for every export. The levy is not being picked on the customs entries as is the norm but on a different collection sheet raising questions on authenticity of the levy. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the SCTIFI meeting held on 16 November 2018, Tanzania reported that this is a weight and measures levy that is paid by all including Tanzania exporters and hence it is not an NTB. The Meeting recommended that the levy should be harmonised across EAC Partner States. |
|
|
NTB-000-760 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-10-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Lack of preferential treatment. Payment of full CET duty on cement exports from Kenya to Tanzania due to interpretation of Chapter 25. This also affects situations where the local content is at a high percentile. Tanzania authorities attach a 35% duty to cement that is not ‘wholly produced’ in an EAC state. This is opposed to previous practice which had other categories on the rules of origin certificate that for cement included ‘value addition’ and/or ‘substantially transformed using material content not exceeding 60%’ - the Authorities do not consider these categories anymore; the rules of origin must state whether the item is either wholly produced or not. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the Bilateral Meeting held on 27th April 2019, both Kenya and Tanzania, Tanzania reported that Cement transfered from Kenya is granted preferential treatment which was disputed by Kenya. The Tanzania Revenue Authority agreed to provide feedback in one week. The meeting was informed by the Secretariat that the NTB was resolved during the CoC meeting of April 2019. |
|
|
NTB-000-760 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-10-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Lack of preferential treatment. Payment of full CET duty on cement exports from Kenya to Tanzania due to interpretation of Chapter 25. This also affects situations where the local content is at a high percentile. Tanzania authorities attach a 35% duty to cement that is not ‘wholly produced’ in an EAC state. This is opposed to previous practice which had other categories on the rules of origin certificate that for cement included ‘value addition’ and/or ‘substantially transformed using material content not exceeding 60%’ - the Authorities do not consider these categories anymore; the rules of origin must state whether the item is either wholly produced or not. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the Regional meeting held on 16th October, 2019 it was agreed that the complaint that says, "Kenya further reported that, in addition, Tanzania has introduced another requirement whereby before Kenya export cement, Kenya manufacturers need to send a sample of cement to Tanzania Government chemist for sampling. This is causing delays and it's costly to test and to take samples to Tanzania. This is really frustrating cement from Kenya." should be deleted from the system as Kenya could not provide evidence on the same. |
|
|
NTB-000-762 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-11-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Lack of Preferential treatment of textiles and apparels products from Kenya when exported into Tanzania |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During SCTIFI meeting held on 16 November 2018, Kenya reported that stay of application ended on 30th June, 2018 and there was no extension for the same. The NTB was therefore resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-764 |
5.13. Other quantity control measures Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Bureau of Standards |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-02-09 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Tanzania does not recognize quality marks issued by Kenya authorities despite the fact that Partner States are implementing harmonized regional standards. Tanzania expects all products imported into that country to meet Tanzania standards. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the Extra Orinally SCTIFI that sat in February, 2018, Tanzania reported that they recognise quality marks on products from other EAC Partner States. Hence this NTB is resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-765 |
2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-08-21 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Tanzania does not recognize price adjustments for duty purposes particularly the reduction by milk processors in Kenya. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the Regional Monitoring Committee meeting of 2018, Tanzania reported that, this is not an NTB but a valuation issue that can be resolved between the revenue authority and the importer. KRA and TRA were therefore quested to hold a bilateral meeting to resolve the matter by 21st November 2018.2. The Regional meeting held from 29 April - 3 May 2019 referred the matter to the Committee on Customs for resolution. |
|
|
NTB-000-766 |
5.13. Other quantity control measures Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-04-27 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Intellectual property infringement. Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority requires manufactures to disclose recipe or formulae which is an intellectual property so as to approve or register products. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the bilateral Meeting held from 23- 27 April 2019, Tanzania reported that what is required is not the formula but the ingridients/composition contained in the product and it is an international requirement. Tanzania was of the view that the NTB should tabled during the meeting of the Standards committee where food and drugs experts are members.
However, the Meeting agreed that this NTB is resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-767 |
7.4. Costly procedures |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority |
Kenya |
Resolved 2019-04-30 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
TFDA delays issuance of registration certificate causing Kenyan companies to lose out on trade. The finalization of the accepted label can take between 3-12 months. This additionally increase the cost of doing business as a manufacturer would have to pay certification fees more than three times to have one label approved due to the deadlines imposed in terms of getting labels approved. Kenya products have been stranded at the borders or manufacturers warehouse because they have not passed TFDA requirements. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Tanzania informed the Regional Monitoring Committee meeting on 3rd May 2019, that TFDA had reduced the certification period from 3- 12 months to 45 days as per international requirements. She observed that most delays were caused by late submission of required information by agents at the time of processing the registration and therefore urged Partner States to respond to queries logged on them on time , to avoid unnecessary delays. |
|
|
NTB-000-770 |
7.4. Costly procedures |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Namanga |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-11-16 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Kenya is facing challenges with the delays in verification of perishable goods namely industrial gases and milk products. Industrial gases are exported in liquid state but they very quickly evaporate into gas if the export trucks are left out in the open sun for more than 48 hours. Also, milk is a sensitive product which if not preserved in conducive environment it will get spoiled therefore, should be treated as perishable products under special clearance. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During SCTIFI meeting held on 16 November 2018, Tanzania reported that since the commencement of the SCT, goods are not verified at the border and hence there are no more delays. NTB was therefore resolved |
|
|
NTB-000-772 |
1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions Policy/Regulatory |
2017-05-05 |
Tanzania: Ministry of Works, Transport & Communication |
Kenya |
Resolved 2018-01-17 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Tanzania are charging railway development levy (RDL) to Kenya products. Tanzania is not adhering to the EAC law where it states clearly that products within the EAC should not be subjected to RDL |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the Bilateral meeting that took place in January 2018, the Permanent/ principal Secretaries took note that Tanzania does not levy RDL on products originating in the EAC region. And hence the NTB was Resolved. |
|