Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 81 to 100 of 135

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-680	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory	2015-09-04	Tanzania: Namanga	Kenya	Resolved 2016-04-29	View
Complaint:	General Motors East Africa sold some vehicles to its dealer in Tanzania which vehicles were charged duty, despite the provisions of the rules of origin which qualify vehicles assembled from CKD as local products and should be sold free of duty within EAC. The Rules of Origin were gazette on the 23rd day of January 2015 and they are fully operational. This is a clear violation of the EAC Rules of Origin. Copies of the EAC Certificate of Origin, the Commercial invoice, the Import Duty Assessment Document & the Import Duty Payment Note for four vehicles that were charged duty at the Namanga border are available for scrutiny if required. We sought an explanation from the Tanzania Revenue Authority but they have not given a substantial explanation except that, in their opinion the rules take effect from October this year
Resolution status note:	The new EAC rules became fully operational in Tanzania at the end of April 2016 and the the operational manuals were circulated to all borders. The vehicles qualifies for preferential treatment under the new rules. This issue was considered resolved during EAC 20th NTBs Forum
NTB-000-669	8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) Policy/Regulatory	2014-09-02	Tanzania: Immigration	Kenya	Resolved 2016-06-30	View
Complaint:	Delay of issuance of work permit by United Republic of Tanzania
Resolution status note:	The issue is not about integrating the permits but the 'delays' in issuing the permit. This anomaly can be corrected. Focal points need to get more information on the nature of Delay. At the Tanzania NMC meeting, Immigration reported that the work permits are processed within 14 days maximum if all information is provided.
NTB-000-664	3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) B3: Labelling, Marking and Packaging requirements Policy/Regulatory	2013-01-01	Tanzania: Tunduma	Burundi	Resolved 2015-11-09	View
Complaint:	TFDA is imposing new requirements on export of BRARUDI beers into Tanzania. TFDA is requesting new labels to include additional information and storage condition for the product that was not required when they submitted the application for export.
Resolution status note:	Burundi reported that TFDA had finally registered Burundi beers and that the company had received its certificate of registration.
NTB-000-657	5.15. Other Policy/Regulatory	2014-12-11	Tanzania: Various State Agencies		Resolved 2023-07-03	View
Complaint:	Numerous monetary charges required by various agencies in the United Republic of Tanzania on exports of dairy products
Resolution status note:	The 42nd SCTIFI noted that the Republic of Uganda and the Republic of Kenya are handling the diary issues bilaterally with the United Republic of Tanzania whereby several meetings at the Ministerial and Summit levels have taken place and are at the final stages to be resolved. Also, the issue is being handled in the ongoing process of harmonization of fees, levies, and charges, and all the charges will be harmonized together with other charges. The SCTIFI hence guided that the NTB should be removed from the Time Bound program and allow the ongoing bilateral processes to be finalized.
NTB-000-654	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2014-12-11	Uganda: Mutukula	Tanzania	Resolved 2015-12-15	View
Complaint:	Rwanda and Uganda have not accorded preferential treatment on exports of rice from Tanzania through Rusumo and Mutukula borders respectively.
Resolution status note:	On 21st December 2015, Uganda Focal Point reported that Uganda was now according preferential treatment for rice originating from Tanzania. This NTBis therefore resolved
NTB-000-653	3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) B15: Authorization requirements for importers Policy/Regulatory	2014-12-11	Tanzania: Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority	Kenya	Resolved 2019-08-21	View
Complaint:	Requirement by Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority for companies exporting to URT to register, re-label, and retesting of certified EAC products exported by other Partner States Reported in 2003.
Resolution status note:	During the meeting of the NTBs Focal Points held from 19- 21 august 2019 , Tanzania reported that TFDA was disbanded therefore the requirements are no longer enforced .
NTB-000-651	8.8. Issues related to transit	2014-12-11	Tanzania: Along Central corridor		Resolved 2016-06-30	View
Complaint:	Tanzania has several weigh bridge stations along the central corridor
Resolution status note:	At the 21st EAC NTBs Regional Forum , Tanzania reported that the NTB had been resolved because there are only three weigh bridges Vigwaza at the coastal region, Njuki in Singida and Nyakahura in Kagera region weigh in motion weighbridges. It takes maximum of 4 days to exit the border from Dar Port and 2 days for fuel tankers.
NTB-000-649	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2014-12-11	Tanzania: Ministry of Transport	Burundi	Resolved 2015-11-30	View
Complaint:	United Republic of Tanzania is charging USD200.00 as transit permit for containers with chemical products.
Resolution status note:	Following the recommendations of the 16th EAC Forum on NTBs, Tanzania removed the transit charges .
NTB-000-647	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2014-12-11	Tanzania: Tanzania National Park	Rwanda	Resolved 2015-11-04	View
Complaint:	Tanzania National Park charges Rwanda transporters transiting through the national park US$300 per truck as national park fees .
Resolution status note:	Tanzania National Park is no longer charging Rwanda transporters transiting through the national park US$300 per truck as national park fees
NTB-000-643	2.6. Additional taxes and other charges	2014-12-09	Tanzania: Dar-es-Salaam Port	Burundi	Resolved 2015-03-26	View
Complaint:	Tanzania Ports Authority is charging all Transit containers located at at Tanzania International Container Terminal Services (TICTS) a miscellaneous Port Charges. On 05 June 2014, a transporter from Burundi was charged US$90 being for miscellaneous port services for a 20ft container
Resolution status note:	At the 16th EAC regional forum on non tariff barriers held in Kigali in December 2014, Tanzania reported that the double handling charges were abolished. This NTB is therefore resolved.
NTB-000-643	2.6. Additional taxes and other charges	2014-12-09	Tanzania: Dar-es-Salaam Port	Burundi	Resolved 2015-03-26	View
Complaint:	Tanzania Ports Authority is charging all Transit containers located at at Tanzania International Container Terminal Services (TICTS) a miscellaneous Port Charges. On 05 June 2014, a transporter from Burundi was charged US$90 being for miscellaneous port services for a 20ft container
Resolution status note:	At the 17th NTB forum held in Nairobi on 24th to 26th March 2015, Tanzania confirmed that these charges were no longer applicable and therefore the NTB was resolved.
NTB-000-642	2.9. Issues related to transit fees	2014-12-09	Tanzania: Dar-es-Salaam Port	Burundi	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	The United Republic of Tanzania via the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare is charging USD200 as registration fee for transit permit on each transit container which contain which contain Chemical products.
Resolution status note:	At the 16th EAC regional forum on non tariff barriers held in Kigali in December 2014, Tanzania reported that the levy was abolished in 2012.This NTB is therefore resolved.
NTB-000-632	8.8. Issues related to transit	2014-05-23	South Africa: Lebombo	South Africa	Resolved 2016-09-13	View
Complaint:	This complaint is registered by FESARTA. Copper Moon Trading, the company that is running the Lebombo dry port at Komatipoort, near the Lebombo/Ressano Garcia border post, is forcing transporters to use and pay for its parking facilities in Komatipoort. This instruction is supported by the Komatipoort municipality. Attached are invoices for this parking and a "ticket" for a truck not parking in the identified facility. As with the situation at the Tunduma/Nakonde border post between Tanzania and Zambia, private companies, supported by the municipalities, cannot force transporters to use their parking facilities. Transporters' vehicles are required to visit the SARS customs clearing offices at the Lebombo dry port and so parking should be provided for them, free of charge, by SARS. If parking is not provided, then trucks must be allowed to park along the roadway.
Resolution status note:	On 13th September 2016, FESARTA advised that the transporters were no longer facing this barrier so the NTB is resolved.
NTB-000-621	1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions	2014-01-26	Tanzania: Nzega Town	Rwanda	Resolved 2014-12-11	View
Complaint:	High way attack that occurred in TANZANIA near NZEGA Town along the Central Corridor
Resolution status note:	At the 16th EAC regional forum on non tariff barriers held in Kigali in December 2014, Tanzania reported that security had improved. Tanzania was providing police escorts. This NTB is therefore resolved.
NTB-000-612	1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions Policy/Regulatory	2013-11-05	Tanzania: at the border of Burundi/Tanzania	Burundi	Resolved 2013-12-20	View
Complaint:	Truck belonging to BRARUDI (the leading Brewery in the Republic of Burundi) has been held at the border of Burundi/Tanzania for a period of 15 days (Tanzania side )because Tanzania Revenue Authority at the border estimate that the products must pay customs duties before enter Tanzania, despite the consignment being accompanied by a certificate of origin issued by Burundi Revenue Authority. And Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority requires the company TO register the products before exporting.
Resolution status note:	On 23 December 2013, Burundi Focal Point reported that BRARUDI Products made in Burundi were allowed to enter in Tanzania following resolution of this NTB during the 13th NMC regional forum held in Burundi 17-20 December 2013.
NTB-000-562	8.1. Government Policy and regulations	2012-12-10	Kenya: Throughout Kenya	Kenya	Resolved 2014-07-03	View
Complaint:	This complaint is registered by FESARTA. The Kenya National Highways Authority (KENHA) is enforcing the axle load limits, rather than the GCM limit for the vehicle combination. This is seriously compromising the ability of the transporters in Kenya to operated effectively and the Kenya Transporters Association (KTA) has taken the matter to court. Some comments by the KTA: 1. KENHA is implementing this axle load rule on an axle by axle case rather than group axles. We realize the official position is group axle because when our enraged members stormed the Mariakani weighbridge yesterday, they promptly switched to weighing on group axles and giving a 5% tolerance, a matter that had hitherto not happened. 2. Their axle weights are 8-16-24 rather than 8-18-24 as the case is said to be in Tanzania. To comply here means one can’t optimize on his load. 3. The Traffic Act in Kenya requires an offender in this case is taken to court, fined and then made to redistribute cargo so that each axle is in conformity before the truck can proceed. The complication arises when the cargo is containerized transit goods which cant be opened sice continer is sealed and opening is criminal! 4. Similar complications arise in the case of liquid cargo which moves rapidly even when truck is being weighed or “sandy” like cargo such as clinker and the like which shifts depending on road terrain/condition or upon braking. 5. Our members are now forced to load 22 to 24 tons of the above cargo instead of the normal 27 tons. Unfortunately the overheads do not come down at all and they are now left with no option but to raise their rates by a similar margin. The question is whether our corridor and hinterland can afford such excessive costs. FESARTA has drawn up a proposal to solve the problem and it is attached to this complaint.
Resolution status note:	On 03 July 2014 FESARTA Kenya was about to sign a Load Charter with its transporters, which covered this issue therefore the NTB should be considered resolved.
NTB-000-522	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2012-06-20	Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority	Kenya	Resolved 2013-04-10	View
Complaint:	Non recognition of EAC certificate of origin by Tanzania Revenue Athority for furniture products manufactured in Kenya
Resolution status note:	At the Tripartite NTBs Online Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism Meeting to Launch the SMS Reporting Tool held from 9-10 April 2013 in Lusaka, Zambia, Tanzania reported that this was a one off incidence which had been resolved.
NTB-000-521	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2012-06-20	Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority	Kenya	Resolved 2013-04-10	View
Complaint:	TRA rejects EAC certificates of origin . Tanzania Revenue Authority imposes a duty of 25% of EABL products exported to its subsidiary Serengeti breweries limited in Tanzania
Resolution status note:	At the Tripartite NTBs Online Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism Meeting to Launch the SMS Reporting Tool held from 9-10 April 2013 in Lusaka, Zambia, Tanzania reported that certificates of origin are now issued for all EAC products both ion the STR and normal exports.
NTB-000-520	6.5. Variable levies Policy/Regulatory	2012-06-20	Tanzania: Tanzania Revenue Authority	Kenya	Resolved 2018-11-16	View
Complaint:	Beef and Pork from Kenya Farmers Choice are being charged 25% by Tanzania because the company is in the duty remission scheme despite the products not benefiting from the duty remission scheme.
Resolution status note:	During SCTIFI meeting held on 16 November2018, Kenya reported that the NTB was resolved
NTB-000-517	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2012-07-16	Democratic Republic of the Congo: KIPUS Mine	Tanzania	Resolved 2012-07-20	View
Complaint:	Tanzania Truck Owners Association (TATOA) reported that Tanzania Trucks, after delivering a consignment they carried from Tanzania to Congo, are charged $100,000/= per truck if they want to carry another consignment on their way back to Dar es Salaam. The attached receipt is just evidence for one transaction but there are other transporters who have paid such charges while there are also other transporters whose vehicles have been detained until now. This fee is charged at KIPUS mine in the name of LOCAL INCOME TAX WHILE LOADING CARGO. Tanzania regards this as an NTB and she needs to know the reason for charging such a huge amount of money from transporters. DRC focal point is requested to treat this matter as urgent since a number of tracks are still detained at Kipus Mine in the D. R. Congo.
Resolution status note:	On 08 October, Tanzania focal point reported that the DRC released the trucks held at the KIPUS Mine . This NTB is therefore considered resolved.

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints