Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 81 to 100 of 855

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-115	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Transport	South Africa	Resolved 2011-01-10	View
Complaint:	Botswana charges very high road levies.
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that Botswana charges road levies on entry to Botswana at the border only. Road levies are used for road maintenance in Botswana, and are only paid once at entry point.
NTB-001-065	5.3. Export taxes	2022-04-01	Botswana: Ministry of Finance	South Africa	Resolved 2023-10-05	View
Complaint:	Botswana government is about to introduce the Tax Stamps on all imported products and that would affect the South African Wine Industry. The Tax Stamp imposition has been confirmed by the Botswana Minister of Finance and they have appointed the Service Provide that would conduct a Research.
Resolution status note:	The NTB BW NCP has provided the legal instruments gazetted by the BW Government on the matter.
NTB-000-097	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2020-03-13	View
Complaint:	Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat.
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that the BMC Act is under review by Ministry of Agriculture to allow entry of other players.
NTB-000-097	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2020-03-13	View
Complaint:	Botswana has a single channel marketing for meat.
Resolution status note:	On 13 March 2020, Botswana Focal Point reported that the Botswana Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food Security was in the process of establishing a meat regulator that will oversee import and export of meat products including beef. A regulation was issued late 2019 repealing the clause on the Botswana Meat Commission (BMC) Act that gave BMC the mandate as the sole exporter of cattle and its edible products, and instead mandated the Minister of Agricultural Development and Food Security to consider applications for any person wishing to export beef and its products.
NTB-000-096	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single channeling marketing for wheat.
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that she does not have a single marketing channel for wheat.
NTB-000-098	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single marketing channel for dairy
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that there is free entry of other players. It is not restrictive
NTB-000-099	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana has single marketing channel for maize
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that she has multi channel maize marketing. Ministry of Agriculture issue import permits to ensure balance between local sourcing and importation.
NTB-000-104	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures	2009-07-26	Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2011-01-10	View
Complaint:	Botswana imposed 15% levy on wheat imports
Resolution status note:	Botswana advised that she does not impose levy on wheat imports.
NTB-000-135	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-27	Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2012-05-03	View
Complaint:	Botswana imposes ad- hoc import levies on fresh produce
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that the levies are no longer obtaining
NTB-000-135	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-27	Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2012-05-03	View
Complaint:	Botswana imposes ad- hoc import levies on fresh produce
Resolution status note:	Botswana indicated that she did not charge levies but closed borders whenever local produce was enough to supply local demand. The Ministry of Agriculture has advised that the dates for border closure and opening are set by a committee composed of traders and producers. The Ministry notes that sufficient time is allowed for traders to notify their external suppliers on time. While the study on Agricultural NTBs recommended gradual elimination of some NTBs, it recommended that others could only be eliminated after provision of adequate alternative support systems. This NTB is of regulatory nature and therefore it is resolved that the NTB be transferred to section of 'Resolved NTBs of policy and regulatory nature' for further consideration
NTB-000-348	5.1. Quantitative restrictions	2010-02-09	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	Botswana	Resolved 2011-07-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana regulates importation and pricing of petroleum products
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that petroleum products are not regulated
NTB-000-348	5.1. Quantitative restrictions	2010-02-09	Botswana: Ministry of Trade	Botswana	Resolved 2011-07-22	View
Complaint:	Botswana regulates importation and pricing of petroleum products
Resolution status note:	On 22 July 2011, Botswana reported that petroleum products are not regulated
NTB-000-347	5.1. Quantitative restrictions	2010-02-09	Botswana: Ministry of Agriculture	Botswana	Resolved 2010-11-29	View
Complaint:	Botswana regulates importation of grains
Resolution status note:	Botswana reported that it has multi channel maize marketing. Ministry of Agriculture issue import permits to ensure balance between local sourcing and importation.
NTB-000-791	8.6. Vehicle standards Policy/Regulatory	2017-11-10	Botswana: Kazungula Road		Resolved 2018-04-10	View
Complaint:	Botswana requires that transporters get exemption permits issued either in Francistown or Gaborone, the same original permits must then be couriered to Kazungula where the permit then must be presented to the Kazungula PTC for authorisation and stamping, then to the Botswana Power Corporation for authorisation and stamping, only then can the truck proceed to Kazungula weighbridge and present the permit and be inspected and weighed.These permits are only valid for 7 days so the window in which to use the same permit is very narrow, especially since there are sometimes issues where Zambia Revenue Authority Asycuda system experiences failures and down time. Further, Transporters are required to put up abnormal signs and red flags on the trucks before they can be released by the Kazungula weighbridge staff. The weighbridge does not permit trucks with over 4.3 Metres high is not permit and yet most of the trailers which the transporters run are just under 4.4 Meters high with a High Cube container on board. There are no bridges or low power lines, to which a High cube container with a height of 4.6 Metres , would pose a threat to on the entire route from Zambia through Botswana and South Africa . This is another one of many hurdles being put in the road which is increasing the costs of regional trade and is yet another barrier to trade on our corridor to South Africa.
Resolution status note:	On 10th April 2018 , Botswana Focal Point reported that Botswana is in compliance with the Regional Standard Dimensions of Vehicles in all its aspects; and specifically the 4.3m overall height. Exemption permits for over height vehicles is issued from two (2) central locations i.e. Gaborone and Francistown. However Botswana has eased the problem on transporters by issuing Annual exemptions which means the transporter need only to apply once in a year for his Fleet crossing into Botswana. The exemption has no limitations on the number of trips the transporter undertakes nor when the trips are made. The frequent users of the corridor are at liberty to apply for a one year permit. Transporters are expected to apply for the permit either through their representatives or agents well in advance to enable Department of Roads to process the permit on time. Copies are sent to all the weighbridges along the route that the truck will follow.For safety purposes abnormal signs and red flags are supposed to be mounted on the vehicles before they are allowed onto the public road.
NTB-000-445	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2011-09-02	Burundi: Revenue Authority	Tanzania	Resolved 2012-04-26	View
Complaint:	Burundi customs system does not interface within the customs’ systems in the Revenue Authorities in Partner States
Resolution status note:	Burundi and Rwanda NMC consultations held during the 3rd meeting of the Tripartite NTBs Focal Points and NMC Chairs in Dar-es-salaam on 19-20 April 2012 concluded that the issue had been resolved after Rwanda bureau of standards recognised that Burundi water meets international standards.
NTB-000-468	3.3. Standards disparities B6: Product identity requirement	2011-10-24	Rwanda: Akanyaru-Haut	Burundi	Resolved 2013-04-10	View
Complaint:	Burundian mineral water was denied entry into Rwanda on grounds that the water did not comply with Rwanda quality standards.
Resolution status note:	At the Tripartite NTBs Online Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism Meeting to Launch the SMS Reporting Tool held from 9-10 April 2013 in Lusaka, Zambia, Rwanda reported that this NTB had been resolved by Burundi.
Products:	2201.10: Mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar, other sweetening matter or flavoured
NTB-000-926	7.3. Corruption	2019-11-04	Mozambique: Delegação Aduaneira de Zobwe	Malawi	Resolved 2021-07-09	View
Complaint:	Bus travelers are being charged R50 on Zobue and Cuchamano border with Mozambique for passport stamping on Entry and Exit as traders travel by Road.
Resolution status note:	The National Migration Service (SENAMI) suspended the border fee in 2010 and, even when it was being charged, it was forty-nine Meticais and forty-four Centavos (49.44 MZN) and not fifty Rands.
NTB-000-732	5.15. Other	2017-01-01	Zambia: Zambia		Resolved 2018-01-25	View
Complaint:	Carbon Tax Increase over 37% for commercial vehicles
Resolution status note:	On 25th January 2018, Zambia Focal Point advised that the measure was for all motor vehicles and the highest percentage of 40% was on motor cycles and small vehicles. 37% on commercial vehicle was among the lowest percentage increases. This measure was intended to adjust the carbon emission surtax for inflation. It had not been adjusted since its introduction in 2006. This is in line with the Customs and Excise Act 47 of 2016. We propose that this be considered resolved
NTB-001-220	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2024-07-01	Uganda: Uganda Revenue Authorities	Kenya	Resolved 2025-05-30	View
Complaint:	Certificate of Origin Declined (Issues of RoO) Uganda has declined to recognize the Certificate of Origin for chewing gum manufactured by Kenafric Industries transferred to M/S Glorre International Limited on concern that the manufacturing process does not exceed the provisions in Rule 7 of the EAC Rules of Origin, 2015. Kenya NMC suggests that the process involves the use of machinery and technical expertise. Therefore, the process of manufacturing chewing gum exceeds the provisions under Rule 7 of the EAC rules of origin.
Resolution status note:	The 38th RMC was informed by the Republic of Kenya that the NTB was resolved
NTB-000-473	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2011-11-05	Uganda: Malaba	Rwanda	Resolved 2013-04-10	View
Complaint:	Certificates of origin are not provided at the borders between Rwanda and Uganda and cross border traders are obliged to collect them from Kampala for goods exceeding 500 US$. The long distance to Kampala is time consuming and additional cost to doing business.
Resolution status note:	At the Tripartite NTBs Online Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism Meeting to Launch the SMS Reporting Tool held from 9-10 April 2013 in Lusaka, Zambia, Uganda reported that Certificates are issued at the border so this NTB has been resolved. Rwanda intervened that it is only simplified certificate of origin for small scale traders that are available at the border but that for large scale traders has to be obtained from Kampala. Uganda undertook to confirm on whether Certificates of origin for large scale traders are available at the border.

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...41 42 43 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints