Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 561 to 580 of 800

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-299	5.12. Export restraint arrangements Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-09	Madagascar: Ministry of Trade	Madagascar	Resolved 2011-03-11	View
Complaint:	Government imposes export constraints on the exportation of wood
Resolution status note:	This is a measure to safeguard the environment. The elimination of non-tariff barriers will be done gradually.
NTB-000-298	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2009-09-08	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2012-06-15	View
Complaint:	Bond registration fees are generally high in all SADC countries
Resolution status note:	The 10th meeting of SADC Committee on Trade facilitation held on 14-15 June 2012 noted that the issue of bonds is normally managed by private sector, mostly banks therefore commercial rates would prevail. It was also noted that within the SADC Customs work programme, there is work to facilitate single transit bond, the result of which should be ready by March 2013. This NTB was therefore considered resolved on grounds that bond registration fees are cahrged at market rates.
NTB-000-294	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Walvsi Bay sea port	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Delays occur at Walvis Bay to get the required documentation out in time for the trucks to leave. It leads to the company paying demurrage/penalties for trucks standing idle
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel in process
NTB-000-292	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2011-11-10	View
Complaint:	Empty space on trucks cannot be utilized due to the 'Third Country' rules. This law should be abolished within SADC
Resolution status note:	SADC Secretariat reported that, reducing costs of doing business in the region is one of the key objectives of the SADC Secretariat. However, some interventions of the Secretariat are bound by its regional economic integration process. SADC FTA enables goods originating in Member States applying the FTA to enter duty free and quota free under provisions in the SADC Protocol on Trade. For this economic activity, economic operators are not obliged to be registered as economic operators in the countries where goods are delivered if only they are delivering goods. A deeper regional economic integration would be needed in order to allow foreign economic operators to engage in business activities in Member States, benefit from local business opportunities but also meeting fiscal obligations arising from such operations. This is a level of economic integration closer to common market and which forms SADC long term vision.
NTB-000-290	8.8. Issues related to transit	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia requires provisional payments for all transit cargo through Namibia.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that the provisional payment is required to secure duties and taxes of the goods in transit that can be refunded upon submission of export documents by the exporter.
NTB-000-287	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures	2009-09-08	Zambia: Other Zambia	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The Zambian Government is delaying implementation of phase down schedule of tariffs for imports of pasta under the SADC Trade Protocol.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that Zambia is on schedule in terms of implementing her obligations under the SADC Trade Protocol. As a result of Zambia’s successful implementation of the Trade Protocol, Zambia participates in the SADC Free Trade Area. The tariff liberalization of category C is continuing up until 2010 as provided for in the SADC Trade Protocol.
NTB-000-286	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures	2009-09-08	Zambia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The Zambian Government is delaying implementation of phase down schedule of tariffs for imports of fishmeal under the SADC Trade Protocol.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that she is on schedule in terms of implementing her obligations under the SADC Trade Protocol. As a result of Zambia’s successful implementation of the Trade Protocol, Zambia participates in the SADC Free Trade Area. The tariff liberalization of category C is continuing up until 2010 as provided for in the SADC Trade Protocol.
NTB-000-285	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures	2009-09-08	Zambia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The Zambian Government is delaying implementation of phase down schedule of tariffs for imports of salt under the SADC Trade Protocol.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that she is on schedule in terms of implementing her obligations under the SADC Trade Protocol. As a result of Zambia’s successful implementation of the Trade Protocol, Zambia participates in the SADC Free Trade Area. The tariff liberalization of category C is continuing up until 2010 as provided for in the SADC Trade Protocol
NTB-000-281	5.12. Export restraint arrangements Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	In 2004, the South African authorities introduced a commercial export permit requirement for Namibian grown oysters before these oysters could enter South Africa. In addition, an import permit is required from the South African authorities. The industry views this measure as a punitive trade measure, intended to protect the South African industry.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that the importation and exportation of all products is subject to control measures. This is to ensure that there is compliance with specified environmental legislation and with terms and conditions of permits and other authorisations issued in terms of that legislation. For more information please contact: Marine and Coastal Management, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Tel: 021 402 3911 Fax: 021 402 3367
NTB-000-279	5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-05-11	View
Complaint:	3% of the horticulture produce purchases in Namibia need to be locally sourced before any imports are allowed (as from October 2004)
Resolution status note:	Namibia explained that this is a trade measure and not NTB. The resolution is that only 25% of all horticulture produce has to be sourced in Namibia; however, this figure is determined by the industry themselves.
NTB-000-277	5.3. Export taxes	2009-09-08	Rwanda: Ministry of Trade	Rwanda	Resolved 2011-10-27	View
Complaint:	Export levies of 15% is charged on unprocessed goat hides
Resolution status note:	Rwanda hs lifted the ban on exportation of raw hides and skins. However, the 5th EAC regional forum on NTBs held from 1-3 Septmber 2011 noted that the ban was appllied by all EAC countries with the aim to encourage value addition on raw hides towards export.
NTB-000-272	1.1. Export subsidies A9: SPS measures n.e.s.	2009-09-08	Zambia: Other Zambia	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Issuing of Phytosanitary Certificates for exports of cotton cake to Namibia by Zambian Authorities is too slow.
Resolution status note:	Zambian reported that authorities process the above certificates as quickly as possible. The only time there is a delay is when the client does not have the right documentation, or has missing documentation
NTB-000-270	1.1. Export subsidies A9: SPS measures n.e.s.	2009-09-08	Zambia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-03-04	View
Complaint:	Issuance of Phytosanitary Certificates by Zambian Authorities on exports of molasses, from Zambia, is too slow.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that for molasses, the issuance is almost instant as this by product is not fumigated.
NTB-000-268	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Inspections, sealing/tagging of cargo cause major delays.
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel is in progress
NTB-000-268	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Inspections, sealing/tagging of cargo cause major delays.
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel in progress
NTB-000-266	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The following stringent conditions stringent and cumbersome conditions are applied on the re-export (in bond mainly to Angola) of controlled petroleum products subject to permit: a) A trade permit obtained from MTI a copy of which is to be supplied to the ministry. B) The oil company involved and prices qouted shall be reviewed in writing in MTI. c) Prices shall include all basic purchase costs
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that this information is required for the Government to determine the amount of tax to be paid by the exporting company and for Custom and excise levies
NTB-000-265	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	General export licences and permits issued for all non SACU exports are processed by hand. There is no interface between the MTI permit system and ASYCUDA. The system is unpredictable with ever changing procedures as per the SACU agreement's Jacobsens' Index. The IEM requirements are not widely known, especially among incidental traders. There is limited capacity at MTI to handle and process the import and export permits. At present only one official is handling the permits. HS codes need to be obtained from Customs and Excise since MTI is not equiped to assist in this.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that the system determines the change in the rate of duties but not procedures due to economic and policy considerations. Information leaflets on IEM are readily available at the Customs information centre and more will be available at MTI.
NTB-000-264	5.12. Export restraint arrangements Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	An export licence is required for all non-SACU SADC exports,even if product does not feature on the positive list. No general export licencing applies to SACU trade.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that an export permit but not a license is required for controlled products only
NTB-000-263	1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2012-04-26	View
Complaint:	There are no less than six ministries, the Namibian police, two Marketing Boards and a Statutory Board involved in the management of imports and exports. The onus is upon the applicant to collect all relevant permits/ certificates from line ministries and other bodies, before a commercial import/ export permit application can be made to MTI. For certain goods, up to three different points of control apply.
Resolution status note:	At the 3rd meeting the Tripartite NTBs Focal Points and NMC Chairs held in Dar -es-Salaam on 19-20 April 2012, Namibia reported that the Ministry of Trade and Industry would only require authorised or a clearance certificate when a client is importing or exporting a controlled product that needs verification to determine the value for tax purposes and subsequent issuance of the permit by the Ministry of Trade and Industry. The meeting accepted Namibia’s submission to resolve this NTB
NTB-000-261	7.4. Costly procedures	2009-09-08	Angola: Ondjiva Customs	Namibia	Resolved 2011-11-30	View
Complaint:	Extended and unpredictable turnaround time resulting in additional costs of trucking into Angola.
Resolution status note:	During the NTBs national workshop held in Angola on 30 November 2011 it was reported that customs observations were that truck drivers leave trucks at the Angola borders for 3 or more days and return to Oshikango to resolve personal issues, claiming that they are processing documents. Too many trucks are parked at the border without information where the drivers are. In some cases drivers have reported that they are not clear of the physical addresses of destination of the load in Angola. Angola Customs is investing in creating the best conditions for commercial and non commercial border users. Santa Clara border is undergoing a massive expansion with a view to become a regional and international example of trade facilitation infrastructures.

<< Previous 1 2 3...27 28 29 30 31...38 39 40 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints