| Complaint number |
NTB Type
Check allUncheck all |
Date of incident |
Location |
Reporting country or region (additional) |
Status |
Actions |
|
NTB-000-268 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Revenue Authority |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-12-01 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Inspections, sealing/tagging of cargo cause major delays. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Recruitment of personnel in progress |
|
|
NTB-000-279 |
5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) Policy/Regulatory |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture |
Namibia |
Resolved 2011-05-11 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
3% of the horticulture produce purchases in Namibia need to be locally sourced before any imports are allowed (as from October 2004) |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia explained that this is a trade measure and not NTB. The resolution is that only 25% of all horticulture produce has to be sourced in Namibia; however, this figure is determined by the industry themselves. |
|
|
NTB-000-294 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Walvsi Bay sea port |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-12-01 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Delays occur at Walvis Bay to get the required documentation out in time for the trucks to leave. It leads to the company paying demurrage/penalties for trucks standing idle |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Recruitment of personnel in process |
|
|
NTB-000-103 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-07-26 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Namibia imposed export levies on live animals, hides and skins . |
|
|
NTB-000-112 |
7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues |
2009-07-26 |
Namibia: Ministry of Home Affairs |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Work permits are required from consultants and business representatives even for one day visits. |
|
|
NTB-000-147 |
1.8. Import bans Policy/Regulatory |
2009-07-27 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Namibia imposed an import ban on wheat flour |
|
|
NTB-000-243 |
5.10. Prohibitions Policy/Regulatory |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
The importation of wheat flour into Namibia is prohibited. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that this measure is only allowed to protect local milling industry therefore not an NTB |
|
|
NTB-000-251 |
7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Customs documentation not stamped on export of pharmaceuticals to RSA, Angola and Botswana,is left behind and delivered late resulting in late claim or no claim of VAT. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that, procedurally no parcels are allowed to leave the Border with out the accompanying documentation. The same procedures are expected to apply at the border of the receiving country otherwise the items cannot be cleared |
|
|
NTB-000-258 |
6.2. Administrative fees Policy/Regulatory |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Namibia Agronomic Board |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
The Namibian Agronomic Board decided not to register agents for white maize imports anymore. The permit fee is now NAD51.00/permit and the permit is valid for a specific period (one month) only |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that there is no need for agents for white maize imports. The permit fee of N$ 51.00 covers administrative costs only. Period of validation is one month because all imports are effected in one month. The import of maize and maize products from all 3rd parties is only regulated for the time the local harvest is not taken up by the local milling sector. |
|
|
NTB-000-264 |
5.12. Export restraint arrangements Policy/Regulatory |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
An export licence is required for all non-SACU SADC exports,even if product does not feature on the positive list. No general export licencing applies to SACU trade. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that an export permit but not a license is required for controlled products only |
|
|
NTB-000-265 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
General export licences and permits issued for all non SACU exports are processed by hand. There is no interface between the MTI permit system and ASYCUDA. The system is unpredictable with ever changing procedures as per the SACU agreement's Jacobsens' Index. The IEM requirements are not widely known, especially among incidental traders. There is limited capacity at MTI to handle and process the import and export permits. At present only one official is handling the permits. HS codes need to be obtained from Customs and Excise since MTI is not equiped to assist in this. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that the system determines the change in the rate of duties but not procedures due to economic and policy considerations. Information leaflets on IEM are readily available at the Customs information centre and more will be available at MTI. |
|
|
NTB-000-266 |
2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Ministry of Trade |
Namibia |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
The following stringent conditions stringent and cumbersome conditions are applied on the re-export (in bond mainly to Angola) of controlled petroleum products subject to permit:
a) A trade permit obtained from MTI a copy of which is to be supplied to the ministry.
B) The oil company involved and prices qouted shall be reviewed in writing in MTI.
c) Prices shall include all basic purchase costs |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that this information is required for the Government to determine the amount of tax to be paid by the exporting company and for Custom and excise levies |
|
|
NTB-000-290 |
8.8. Issues related to transit |
2009-09-08 |
Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority |
South Africa |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Namibia requires provisional payments for all transit cargo through Namibia. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Namibia reported that the provisional payment is required to secure duties and taxes of the goods in transit that can be refunded upon submission of export documents by the exporter. |
|
|
NTB-000-146 |
1.8. Import bans |
2009-07-27 |
Rwanda: Ministry of Agriculture |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2010-07-30 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
An import ban on wheat flour has been imposed |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Rwanda reported that the issue was resolved internally |
|
|
NTB-000-039 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin |
2004-05-23 |
Rwanda: Ministry of Trade |
Kenya |
Resolved 2010-11-22 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Kenya complained that the Authorities in Rwanda has denied market access of galvanized steel sheets. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Rwanda reported that issue was resolved through EAC |
|
|
Products:
|
7301.10: Sheet piling of iron or steel, whether or not drilled, punched or made from assembled elements |
|
|
NTB-000-277 |
5.3. Export taxes |
2009-09-08 |
Rwanda: Ministry of Trade |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2011-10-27 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Export levies of 15% is charged on unprocessed goat hides |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
Rwanda hs lifted the ban on exportation of raw hides and skins. However, the 5th EAC regional forum on NTBs held from 1-3 Septmber 2011 noted that the ban was appllied by all EAC countries with the aim to encourage value addition on raw hides towards export. |
|
|
NTB-000-468 |
3.3. Standards disparities B6: Product identity requirement |
2011-10-24 |
Rwanda: Akanyaru-Haut |
Burundi |
Resolved 2013-04-10 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Burundian mineral water was denied entry into Rwanda on grounds that the water did not comply with Rwanda quality standards. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
At the Tripartite NTBs Online Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism Meeting to Launch the SMS Reporting Tool held from 9-10 April 2013 in Lusaka, Zambia, Rwanda reported that this NTB had been resolved by Burundi. |
|
|
Products:
|
2201.10: Mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added sugar, other sweetening matter or flavoured |
|
|
NTB-000-580 |
8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) |
2013-04-17 |
Rwanda: Rusumo |
Rwanda |
Resolved 2014-07-02 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Lack of parking facilities at Rusumo Border Post is creating congestion and clearance delays. |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
On 03 July 2014 FESARTA reported that there were initiatives to improve this border post and so the NTB is resolved. |
|
|
NTB-000-644 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin |
2014-11-16 |
Rwanda: Rwanda Customs Authority
and also in
Majerwa |
Egypt |
Resolved 2016-08-24 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
We are importing Wheat flour from Egypt from one of the Biggest Flour mill and factory in Egypt. We have original Certificate of Origin and Comesa certificate. But they do not accept and put us import Duty. Before it is 100% Duty free. But now since september they are not accepting it. Egypt is part of Comesa and Good produced in Egypt and 100% Duty free. So why is wheat flour not accepted. Please help |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the 5th meeting of COMESA NTBs Focal Points, the two parties reported that the certificate of origin was now being recognised and therefore the NTB had been resolved. |
|
|
Products:
|
1101: Wheat or meslin flour. |
|
|
NTB-000-679 |
2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin Policy/Regulatory |
2014-01-23 |
Rwanda: Rwanda Revenue Authority |
Egypt |
Resolved 2016-08-24 |
View |
|
Complaint:
|
Rwanda doubts the originating status of wheat flour exported by Egypt |
|
|
Resolution status note:
|
During the 5th Meeting of COMESA NTBs Focal Points held in Nairobi fro 23-25 August 2016, Egypt reported that the complainant had not been forth coming with additional information to facilitate consideration of this matter by the countries, In that regard, The two parties therefore decided that the matter be considered resolved . |
|