Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 281 to 300 of 855

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-140	5.1. Quantitative restrictions	2009-07-27	Malawi: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Malawi controls quantities of imports of wheat products
Resolution status note:	Malawi reported that there is no quantitative control of wheat products
NTB-000-177	1.1. Export subsidies A11: Prohibitions for sanitary and phytosanitary reasons	2009-07-27	Malawi: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Ban on imports of fresh meat products from South Africa and Zimbabwe
Resolution status note:	Malawi reported that there is no ban on meat imports but licensing measures were introduced when there was an outbreak of foot and mouth and bird flu diseases
NTB-000-102	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Mauritius: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Mauritius has single marketing channel for agricultural products
Resolution status note:	Mauritius reported that she is a net food importer and therefore state regulated agencies are necessary to coordinate food imports into that country for food security purposes
NTB-000-141	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-27	Mauritius: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Mauritius charges an export tax on sugar
Resolution status note:	Mauritius reported that taxes were eliminated in 2004
NTB-000-103	5.3. Export taxes	2009-07-26	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia imposed export levies on live animals, hides and skins .
NTB-000-112	7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues	2009-07-26	Namibia: Ministry of Home Affairs	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Work permits are required from consultants and business representatives even for one day visits.
NTB-000-147	1.8. Import bans Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-27	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia imposed an import ban on wheat flour
NTB-000-290	8.8. Issues related to transit	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Namibia requires provisional payments for all transit cargo through Namibia.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that the provisional payment is required to secure duties and taxes of the goods in transit that can be refunded upon submission of export documents by the exporter.
NTB-000-123	7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure	2009-07-26	Seychelles: Other Seychelles	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Inadequate cold room facilities at ports
Resolution status note:	Seychelles reported that having adequate cold storage facility at airport and sea port is considered one future area of development.
NTB-000-124	2.14. Other	2009-07-26	SADC	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Training of new customs recruits in the region
Resolution status note:	Seychelles reported that training of new recruits is a point of concern for Seychelles. Training especially for customs officers, on R.O.O, clearing process, investigation, inspection, to conduct time release study ect...is in progress.
NTB-000-125	7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-26	Seychelles: Port Victoria	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Some businesses complained that port handling facilities at the ports are unable to handle containers that exceed 6methers (20ft) thereby limiting exporters in implementing the most cost effective way of transporting their products.
Resolution status note:	Seychelles reported that a new plan for handling of containers has been designed and is expected to ease the current burden in the handling of containers; however it is not too clear when the renovation project will kick start.
NTB-000-071	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Raw sugar can only be exported through a single channel
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that all excess raw sugar is exported by SASA on behalf of producers simply to safeguard on logistical costs etc to minimize the distortive effects of the world market. The manner in which it is done in SA does not conform to what is normally referred to as single channel - the implications of single channel can be much broader.
NTB-000-076	1.1. Export subsidies Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa offers a large number of export incentives for to promote locally produced exports.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that export incentives are offered to promote manufactured exports and exports in general
NTB-000-106	2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures	2009-07-26	Eswatini: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Swaziland imposed import levy for dairy products.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that there is an import levy on dairy products imposed and collected by Swaziland Dairy Board
NTB-000-128	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges	2009-07-26	Eswatini: Bordergate	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Lack of standardization in application of regulations, which currently differ per individual officer, per border post.
Resolution status note:	Swaziland reported that Standards in application of procedures are in place. Where these are not clear officers may use discretion. This results in non uniformity.
NTB-000-113	7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure	2009-07-26	Tanzania: Dar-es-Salaam Port	South Africa	Resolved 2011-05-23	View
Complaint:	Periodic port congestion in Tanzania makes logistical planning near impossible , which impact negatively on perishable exports.
Resolution status note:	Tanzania reported that by July 2010, the import container dwell time had been reduced to 10 days, ship waiting time from 13 days to 4 days and ship turnaround time from 19 days to 3 days. This improvement has been attributable to additional investment to increase handling capacity which involved reorganisation of the port area (additional capacity of 14,000 TEU's) and opening of new ICD (additional capacity of 10,000 TEU's). This is complimented by supportive tariff for ICD and punitive tariff for overstayed containers within the port. New customs procedures which include online submission of declarations and supporting documents, reduced percentage of physical verifications, partial submission of manifest all have contributed positively to reduce dwell time. Efforts are now geared towards implementing a single window port community system PCS TO FURTHER REDUCE CONTAINER DWELL TIME TO 5 DAYS. Establishment of ICD was meant to create additional space of approximately 10,000 TEU's as pointed out earlier. All transit containers were excluded in the process of being sent to ICD in order to reduce the inconvenience to the customers and also get rid of the double handling that would be created by sending the transit containers to ICD. ICD are currently working as an extension of the port and hence monitoring of transit containers not sent to ICD will be easily monitored. Therefore this will not be subjected to any charges since all transit containers will be stationed at the port.
NTB-000-101	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-26	Zimbabwe: Ministry of Agriculture	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Zimbabwe has single marketing channel for basic commodities.
Resolution status note:	Zimbabwe reported that this is no longer obtaining.
NTB-000-394	1.1. Export subsidies A84: Inspection requirement Policy/Regulatory	2011-01-15	Angola: At the point of offloading.	South Africa	Resolved 2015-04-07	View
Complaint:	Ministry of Agriculture in Angola has implemented decree Nr 02/08. This decree requires the inspector to be present at the time of offloading, and to draw samples per load, line item and batch. As there are on average over 100 lines per container and more than one batch per line, this can result in as many as 300 samples being drawn per container. The remaining items will need to be placed in quarantine until testing is finalized and release given. Given that on average 3 containers arrive in Luanda daily, more than 900 items from Shoprite alone will create a problem for the Lab. Their turn around time of 3 days will be impossible to maintain. Many of the products are also time sensitive, which means that by the time final release is given, there may be very little shelf life left, if at all. Then there is also the cost to consider. Sampling and testing is part and parcel of the business but taken to the extreme as is the case here, it becomes a very costly and ultimately damaging excercise both to the Business and the end consumer (reduced shelf life, less choice). Suggestions: 1. Allow a South African authority (SABS, NRCS) to sample and inspect the goods before dispatching and issue a certificate against the findings, to accompany the load. 2. Allow Shoprite to send samples of the goods onboard via courier company so that the inspection can commence and thus be completed and the certificates issued by the time that the load arrives at the store level. The batch number can be verified by an independant body.
Resolution status note:	On 7th April 2015, South Africa Focal Point reported that they had received confirmation from the complainant that NTB 394, reported by SA against Angola should be recorded as 'resolved' because what was complained about had not been enforced
Products:	0401.10: Milk and cream of a fat content by weight of <= 1%, not concentrated nor containing added sugar or other sweetening matter and 1601.00: Sausages and similar products, of meat, offal or blood; food preparations based on these products
NTB-000-411	1.1. Export subsidies A15: Authorization requirement for importers for sanitary and phytosanitary reasons	2011-03-23	South Africa: National Dept Agricultural Registrar : Act no 36 of 1947	South Africa	Resolved 2011-04-21	View
Complaint:	My company submitted renewal of existing Farm Feed Registrations at 12 Dec 2010 All the FF regestrations have expired on 28 Feb. 2011 We have enqeired numerous times on the renewal with no satisfaction. Th ecompany is stuck with 1000mt of cotton oilcake and 100mt of meat and bone meal that can not come in to South Africa from Zimbabwe and Namibia The local feed plants and feed lots are running out of stock with no local stocks to supply. We therefore seek help to have our applications processed by the relevant Ministry/Department
Resolution status note:	The Department of Agriculture & Fisheries renewd the licence on 28 March 2011
Products:	1207.2: - Cotton seeds :
NTB-000-425	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2011-07-21	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	South Africa	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	DRC transit charges are too exhorbitant. For example, a truck delivering to Tenke, will have to pay $340 + 750 + 125 + 125 = $1340 for one return trip.That is, providing the truck doesn’t wait more than one day at the Zambian border. There have been many complaints about it, but little seems to be done. There are ongoing efforts by the RFA and other stakeholders to get the toll fees as low as possible yielded some positive resulted in a once off reduction of the fees which still are too high. Each trip through Kasumbalesa to Lubumbashi costs a staggering US$ 125.There is need for transparency and fair toll fees at regional level.
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that the NTB does not exist at present.

<< Previous 1 2 3...13 14 15 16 17...41 42 43 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints