Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 441 to 460 of 883

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-298	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2009-09-08	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2012-06-15	View
Complaint:	Bond registration fees are generally high in all SADC countries
Resolution status note:	The 10th meeting of SADC Committee on Trade facilitation held on 14-15 June 2012 noted that the issue of bonds is normally managed by private sector, mostly banks therefore commercial rates would prevail. It was also noted that within the SADC Customs work programme, there is work to facilitate single transit bond, the result of which should be ready by March 2013. This NTB was therefore considered resolved on grounds that bond registration fees are cahrged at market rates.
NTB-000-352	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2010-02-10	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2011-11-10	View
Complaint:	The cabotage law applied by SADC Member states contributes to high transport costs. The law does not allow an empty truck to carry back a load from a third country. For example, a South African truck dropping off a load in Namibia cannot pick up a load in Namibia destined for Botswana even though this truck is using trans Kalahari Highway linking the two countries
Resolution status note:	SADC secretariat responded that : the customs term cabotage as stated in Specific Annex E, Chapter 3 of the revised Kyoto Convention, is applied for imported goods that have not been declared under the condition that they must be transported in a vessel other than the importing vessel in which they arrived in the Customs territory are loaded on board a vessel at a place in the Customs territory and are transported to another place in the same Customs territory where they are then unloaded and cleared. The term can also be used for the same purposes for air transportation (domestic flights). Looking to the complaint technically, one of the SADC Secretariat key objectives is to reduce the costs of doing business in the region. However, some interventions of the Secretariat are bounded by its regional economic integration process. SADC is currently a FTA among its 11 Member States, enabling goods originating in Member States applying the FTA to enter duty free and quota free under certain conditions stated in the SADC Protocol on Trade. For this economic activity, economic operators are not obliged to be registered as economic operators in the countries were goods are delivered. A deeper regional economic integration would be needed in order to allow foreign economic operators to engage in business activities in Member States, benefiting from local business opportunities but also fiscal obligations. This is a level of economic integration closer to common market and which unfortunately, the SADC Protocol on Trade does not provide for.
NTB-000-353	7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure	2010-02-10	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	A truck legally loaded in Namibia may not be legally loaded in another SADC country due to lack of uniform loads and Gross Vehicle Mass (GVM) standards in SADC. There is need to standardize the axle loads
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that this NTB was no longer in place
NTB-000-355	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2010-02-10	SADC	Namibia	Resolved 2012-06-15	View
Complaint:	Bond registration fees are excessively high in all SADC countries. Especially when cargo transits in two countries the bond registration fees become a constraint.
Resolution status note:	The 10th meeting of SADC Committee on Trade facilitation held on 14-15 June 2012 noted that the issue of bonds is normally managed by private sector, mostly banks therefore commercial rates would prevail. It was also noted that within the SADC Customs work programme, there is work to facilitate single transit bond, the result of which should be ready by March 2013. This NTB was therefore considered resolved on grounds that bond registration fees are cahrged at market rates.
NTB-000-256	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Namibia	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	DRC customs, cause problems on road transport through delaying trucks to depart on time to Lubumbashi
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that the NTB does not exist at present.
NTB-000-270	1.1. Export subsidies A9: SPS measures n.e.s.	2009-09-08	Zambia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-03-04	View
Complaint:	Issuance of Phytosanitary Certificates by Zambian Authorities on exports of molasses, from Zambia, is too slow.
Resolution status note:	Zambia reported that for molasses, the issuance is almost instant as this by product is not fumigated.
NTB-000-379	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees Policy/Regulatory	2010-02-19	Democratic Republic of the Congo: Kasumbalesa	Namibia	Resolved 2016-10-07	View
Complaint:	DRC is charging exorbitant fees which are not in line with SADC and COMESA harmonized fees.From 01/02/10 DRC did not reduce their tolls they instead greatly increases them. Road tolls in DRC are about 15 ( 1500 % ) times greater than the SADC recommended. Today a foreign transporter entering DRC at Kasumbalesa going to Tenke Fungurume mine ( 300 kms each way ) is subject to the following tolls and fees (distance of 300 kms into DRC and 300 kms out of DRC): Road toll Kasumbalesa/Lubumbashi return $ 300 ; Road tolls Lubumbashi/Likasi return $ 300; Road tolls Likasi/Tenke return $ 150 ; Government tax $ 50 ; Fumigation Fees $ 50 ; Card entry $ 15 ; Tourism/Vaccination fees $ 35 ; Visa for truck $ 25 ; Break bulk fees $ 20. Total cost to the transporter in Fees and Tolls is $ 945. That works out at $ 157.5 per 100 kms. The SADC agreed is $ 10 per 100 kms.
Resolution status note:	FESARTA reported that the NTB does not exist at present.
NTB-000-242	2.4. Import licensing Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-07-28	View
Complaint:	All imports of white maize, yellow maize i.e. the controlled agronomic crops, are subjected to an import permit from the Namibian Agronomic Board (NAB). The import of white maize meal. During harvesting season which runs from the 1st of May till the end of August/September (depends on the size of the local harvest) the imports of all white maize is prohibited, though subject to availability of local supply
Resolution status note:	At the 9th meeting of the SADC Sub-committee on trade facilitation, Namibia reported that the import of Maize and maize products from all third parties is only regulated for the time the local harvest is not taken up by the local milling sector.
NTB-000-246	7.7. Complex variety of documentation required	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2012-04-26	View
Complaint:	Procedures for VAT (claim back) in Namibia are too complicated
Resolution status note:	At the 3rd meeting the Tripartite NTBs Focal Points and NMC Chairs held in Dar -es-Salaam on 19-20 April 2012, Namibia reported that customs only processess those refund applications accompanied by relevant documentation. The documents required are a completed NA66, a proof of export (SAD 500 that has been dully proceeded at the point of export) and the invoice that the goods have been obtained. This process was to verify that the goods are indeed obtained and exported. If any of these documents are outstanding customs has the right to refuse such payment. The Ministry of Finance, Customs Division was in the process of reviewing customs procedures and once this exercise is finalized the revised procedures will be posted on the customs website and will be made available to the public. The meeting accepted Namibia’s submission to resolve this NTB
NTB-000-250	7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof)	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2012-05-03	View
Complaint:	Customs documentation not stamped on export of cosmetics, creams, ointments to RSA, Angola and Botswana,is left behind and delivered late resulting in late claim or no claim of VAT.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that according to Namibia customs regulations, customs cannot put a stamp on documents that have not been verified by them. It is the duty of the client to make sure that they pass an entry with customs ( declare the items with customs) in order for customs to authenticate such documents and to put the required stamps on the customs documents.
NTB-000-252	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2011-05-11	View
Complaint:	Customs Clearing process at the Oshikango/Santa Clara border is very long.
Resolution status note:	The Ministry of Finance recruited 41 staff members as of January 2011 in an effort to clear up the Customs Clearance process.
NTB-000-263	1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2012-04-26	View
Complaint:	There are no less than six ministries, the Namibian police, two Marketing Boards and a Statutory Board involved in the management of imports and exports. The onus is upon the applicant to collect all relevant permits/ certificates from line ministries and other bodies, before a commercial import/ export permit application can be made to MTI. For certain goods, up to three different points of control apply.
Resolution status note:	At the 3rd meeting the Tripartite NTBs Focal Points and NMC Chairs held in Dar -es-Salaam on 19-20 April 2012, Namibia reported that the Ministry of Trade and Industry would only require authorised or a clearance certificate when a client is importing or exporting a controlled product that needs verification to determine the value for tax purposes and subsequent issuance of the permit by the Ministry of Trade and Industry. The meeting accepted Namibia’s submission to resolve this NTB
NTB-000-268	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Inspections, sealing/tagging of cargo cause major delays.
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel is in progress
NTB-000-268	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures	2009-09-08	Namibia: Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Inspections, sealing/tagging of cargo cause major delays.
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel in progress
NTB-000-279	5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture	Namibia	Resolved 2011-05-11	View
Complaint:	3% of the horticulture produce purchases in Namibia need to be locally sourced before any imports are allowed (as from October 2004)
Resolution status note:	Namibia explained that this is a trade measure and not NTB. The resolution is that only 25% of all horticulture produce has to be sourced in Namibia; however, this figure is determined by the industry themselves.
NTB-000-294	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Walvsi Bay sea port	Namibia	Resolved 2010-12-01	View
Complaint:	Delays occur at Walvis Bay to get the required documentation out in time for the trucks to leave. It leads to the company paying demurrage/penalties for trucks standing idle
Resolution status note:	Recruitment of personnel in process
NTB-000-244	7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues	2009-09-08	Angola: Ministry of Home Affairs	Namibia	Resolved 2011-11-30	View
Complaint:	Processing of visa requirements for business travel and professional staff to enter Angola take long. (10 working days),are costly and rapidly fill the pages of one's passport.
Resolution status note:	During the NTBs national workshop held in Angola on 30 November 2011, Angola reported that Namibian citizens do not require VISA to Angola. VISAs are processed in a period between 2-10 days.
NTB-000-243	5.10. Prohibitions Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The importation of wheat flour into Namibia is prohibited.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that this measure is only allowed to protect local milling industry therefore not an NTB
NTB-000-251	7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof)	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Revenue Authority	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	Customs documentation not stamped on export of pharmaceuticals to RSA, Angola and Botswana,is left behind and delivered late resulting in late claim or no claim of VAT.
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that, procedurally no parcels are allowed to leave the Border with out the accompanying documentation. The same procedures are expected to apply at the border of the receiving country otherwise the items cannot be cleared
NTB-000-258	6.2. Administrative fees Policy/Regulatory	2009-09-08	Namibia: Namibia Agronomic Board	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	The Namibian Agronomic Board decided not to register agents for white maize imports anymore. The permit fee is now NAD51.00/permit and the permit is valid for a specific period (one month) only
Resolution status note:	Namibia reported that there is no need for agents for white maize imports. The permit fee of N$ 51.00 covers administrative costs only. Period of validation is one month because all imports are effected in one month. The import of maize and maize products from all 3rd parties is only regulated for the time the local harvest is not taken up by the local milling sector.

<< Previous 1 2 3...21 22 23 24 25...43 44 45 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints