Non-Tariff Barriers :: Complaints

Resolved complaints

Showing items 301 to 320 of 855

Complaint number	NTB Type Category 1. Government participation in trade & restrictive practices tolerated by governments 1.1. Export subsidies 1.2. Government monopoly in export/import 1.3. State subsidies, procurement, trading, state ownership 1.4. Preference given to domestic bidders/suppliers 1.5. Requirement for counter trade 1.6. Domestic assistance programmes for companies 1.7. Discriminatory or flawed government procurement policies 1.8. Import bans 1.9. Determination of eligibility of an exporting country by the importing country 1.10. Determination of eligibility of an exporting establishment (firm, company) by the importing country 1.11. Occupational safety and health regulation 1.12. Multiplicity and Controls of Foreign exchange market 1.13. "Buy national" policy 1.14. Lack of coordination between government institutions 1.15. Other Category 2. Customs and administrative entry procedures 2.1. Government imposing antidumping duties 2.2. Arbitrary customs classification 2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin 2.4. Import licensing 2.5. Decreed customs surcharges 2.6. Additional taxes and other charges 2.7. International taxes and charges levied on imports and other tariff measures 2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures 2.9. Issues related to transit fees 2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges 2.11. Lack of control in Customs infrastructure 2.12. Lack of capacity of Customs officers 2.13. Issues related to Pre-Shipment Inspections 2.14. Other Category 3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) Category 4. Sanitary & phyto-sanitary (SPS) measures Category 5. Specific limitations 5.1. Quantitative restrictions 5.2. Exchange controls 5.3. Export taxes 5.4. Quotas 5.5. Import licensing requirements 5.6. Proportion restrictions of foreign to domestic goods (local content requirement) 5.7. Minimum import price limits 5.8. Embargoes 5.9. Non-automatic licensing 5.10. Prohibitions 5.11. Quantitative safeguard measures 5.12. Export restraint arrangements 5.13. Other quantity control measures 5.14. Restrictive licenses 5.15. Other Category 6. Charges on imports 6.1. Prior import deposits and subsidies 6.2. Administrative fees 6.3. Special supplementary duties 6.4. Import credit discriminations 6.5. Variable levies 6.6. Border taxes 6.7. Other Category 7. Other procedural problems 7.1. Arbitrariness 7.2. Discrimination 7.3. Corruption 7.4. Costly procedures 7.5. Lengthy procedures 7.6. Lack of information on procedures (or changes thereof) 7.7. Complex variety of documentation required 7.8. Consular and Immigration Issues 7.9. Inadequate trade related infrastructure 7.10. Other Category 8. Transport, Clearing and Forwarding 8.1. Government Policy and regulations 8.2. Administrative (Border Operating Hours, delays at border posts, etc.) 8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit) 8.4. Transport related corruption 8.5. Infrastructure (Air, Port, Rail, Road, Border Posts,) 8.6. Vehicle standards 8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees 8.8. Issues related to transit Other Policy or Regulatory NTB Not a policy or regulatory NTB Check allUncheck all	Date of incident	Location COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Reporting country or region (additional) COMESA Burundi Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Eritrea Eswatini Ethiopia Kenya Libya Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Rwanda Seychelles Somalia Sudan Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe EAC Burundi Democratic Republic of the Congo Kenya Rwanda Somalia South Sudan Tanzania Uganda SADC Angola Botswana Comoros Democratic Republic of the Congo Eswatini Lesotho Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe COMESA EAC SADC	Status	Actions
NTB-000-390	2.10. Inadequate or unreasonable customs procedures and charges	2011-02-14	Mozambique: Customs	Mozambique	Resolved 2011-09-29	View
Complaint:	Specific types of packaging are required to export perishable items to the UK. The packaging materials are not available in Mozambique. They can be imported duty-free as long as the exact same number are re-exported. This is almost always impossible because a small percentage of packets always get damaged in the packing process. However if the exact same number of packets are not exported then the company is required to pay duty on the full number of packages imported, not only on the damaged ones which are not re-exported
Resolution status note:	Mozambique explained that the temporary import of taras and other materials or equipments is legislated by article 28 of the decree 34/2009 of July 6th. For this process duty is not paid at the country entrance. Number 6 of the same article states the various guarantee terms to which such imports are subject. By rule, these must cover the revenue at risk from the damaged packaging and of those whose regularization may not have been justified by re exportation to the origin or definitive importation for local consumption. In a meeting held between SADC Secretariat and Mozambique focal points, Mozambique reported that duty is only charged only on the damaged packages which are not re-exported. Any company experiencing further problems is advised to consult director of Customs.
Products:	0703.10: Fresh or chilled onions and shallots
NTB-000-901	2.8. Lengthy and costly customs clearance procedures Policy/Regulatory	2019-05-03		Kenya	Resolved 2019-10-15	View
Complaint:	South Sudan is subjecting Kenyan exports to Certificate of Conformity (CoC); South Sudan through their Ministry of EAC and Industry has written letters to Kenya manufacturers informing them that there will be a penalty of 15% CIF on all imports into the Republic of South Sudan without CoC. Exporters are required to have their consignments verified in the country of export before shipment.
Resolution status note:	During the Regional Monitoring Committee held on 15th October, 2019 the Republic of Kenya reported that the NTB was resolved.
NTB-001-141	5.5. Import licensing requirements	2023-08-15		Uganda	Resolved 2024-07-04	View
Complaint:	SOUTH SUDAN IS IMPOSING EXTRA LICENSING REQUIREMENTS ON IMPORTS. On August 15, 2023, the South Sudan government, represented by the South Sudan National Bureau of Standards, issued a memo affecting importers in the country. The memo stipulates that all food items imported into South Sudan must be accompanied by a Certificate of Conformity (CoC), which includes an attached Certificate of Analysis from a reputable laboratory. This new requirement has several implications like Extended Process Duration, Business Impediments among others.
Resolution status note:	The CoC is not applicable anymore. Hence the NTB was resolved
NTB-001-101	8.7. Costly Road user charges /fees	2022-11-21		Uganda	Resolved 2023-05-17	View
Complaint:	SOUTH SUDAN IS IMPOSING COSTLY ROAD USER CHARGES/FEES. The government of South Sudan through the National Revenue Authority imposes high charges on Ugandan transporters for road use. In 2022, Exporters from Uganda to South Sudan were paying Six Thousand Pounds (6,000) but received receipts reading Five thousand pounds( 5000). This fee isn't in the law and is very costly.It is also impossible to explain to the truck/cargo owners the difference in money paid and money receipted Currently 2023, Exporters from Uganda to South Sudan are paying Twenty eight Thousand Pounds (28,000) but the receipts they get after payment indicate Twenty One Thousand Pounds (21,000). This is very unfair and increases the cost of doing business.
Resolution status note:	The 34th RMC was informed that the road user charges for Uganda traders are 21,000 SSP. The 7,000 SSP extra payment is an administrative charge payable to the Ministry of Interior Traffic Directorate. The fee is charged on all transporters, not only Ugandan transporters. The meeting was informed that Road user charges in RSS in 2022 was 5,000 SSP. In 2023 RSS is charging transporters RUC amounting 21,000 SSP. The meeting agreed that RSS should stop charging the extra 7,000 SSP on top of the road user charges which are not issued a receipt.
NTB-001-102	2.6. Additional taxes and other charges	2022-12-22		Uganda	Resolved 2025-05-30	View
Complaint:	SOUTH SUDAN IS IMPOSING COSTLY CHARGES FOR SECURITY ON ENTRY. The government of South Sudan through the National Revenue Authority imposes high charges on Ugandan transporters as payment for security for entering Southsudan This is very unfair and increases the cost of doing business. This fee isn't in the law and is very costly.
Resolution status note:	The 38th RMC was informed that the NTB was resolved
NTB-000-074	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Malawi	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South African Government has monopoly on trade in tobacco
Resolution status note:	South Afric areported that the applied tariff rate for tobacco imported from SADC countries is zero. Apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of tobacco in South Africa.
NTB-000-073	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Malawi	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South African government has monopoly on trade in Tea
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that the applied tariff rate for tea imported from SADC countries is zero. Apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of tea in South Africa.
NTB-000-072	1.2. Government monopoly in export/import	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Malawi	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South African Government has monopoly in the trading of basic food commodities.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that apart from WTO compatible SPS regulations there are no other technical barriers, including quantitative restrictions, on the importation or exportation of Basic Food Commodities in South Africa.
NTB-001-041	3. Technical barriers to trade (TBT) B6: Product identity requirement	2021-11-04	South Africa: Beit Bridge	Zimbabwe	Resolved 2021-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa Port Health officials demanding an extended description on one of our products. The product is a sweet type described as Apricots on both packaging and invoice but the officials want us to have the packaging written Apricots sweets. We have been exporting the sweet to South Africa for more than 5 years.
Resolution status note:	The company had been allowed to export its consignment to South Africa after removing prohibited products. The NTB was resolved are following required procedures
Products:	2008.50: Apricots, prepared or preserved, whether or not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or spirit (excl. preserved with sugar but not laid in syrup, jams, fruit jellies, marmalades, fruit purée and pastes, obtained by cooking)
NTB-000-081	1.1. Export subsidies B14: Authorization requirements for importing certain products	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Tanzania	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa places adhoc requirements on the importation of perishable goods in the form of standards
Resolution status note:	Soth Africa reported that compulsory specifications for perishable goods are aimed at ensuring the health and safety of the consumer and fair trading practices. The relevant internationally recognised Codex Standards and Codes of Practice are used as a basis for these compulsory specifications. Documents from Codex are specifically referenced by the WTO-SPS Agreement.
NTB-000-076	1.1. Export subsidies Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	South Africa	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa offers a large number of export incentives for to promote locally produced exports.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that export incentives are offered to promote manufactured exports and exports in general
NTB-000-369	1.1. Export subsidies A84: Inspection requirement Policy/Regulatory	2010-02-10	South Africa: Ministry of Agriculture	Zambia	Resolved 2011-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa is not facilitating inspection of production areas for issuance of PQPS certificate for exports of fruits to Zambia as per requirement by the Ministry of Agriculture in Zambia.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that Zambia needs to send information needed to evaluate their plant disease situation, legislation, standards and other requirements to the South African Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries . PQPS certificates can not be issued if the above information is not known.
NTB-000-369	1.1. Export subsidies A84: Inspection requirement Policy/Regulatory	2010-02-10	South Africa: Ministry of Agriculture	Zambia	Resolved 2011-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa is not facilitating inspection of production areas for issuance of PQPS certificate for exports of fruits to Zambia as per requirement by the Ministry of Agriculture in Zambia.
Resolution status note:	On 1 June 2011 , South Afric areported that Zambia was not able to send information needed to evaluate their plant disease situation, legislation, standards and other requirements. PQPS certificates can therefore not be issued if the above information is not known
NTB-000-091	2.3. Issues related to the rules of origin	2009-07-26	South Africa: SouthAfrica Revenue Services	Mauritius	Resolved 2011-03-09	View
Complaint:	South Africa is not accepting the certificate of origin for cake decorations from Mauritius.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that this is no longer existing
NTB-000-085	2.6. Additional taxes and other charges	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa is charging import levy on imports of pasta
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that all tariffs applied by SA to SADC countries have been agreed to on the SADC Protocol on Trade, According to the tariff book, this product is traded free under
NTB-000-084	2.6. Additional taxes and other charges	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Namibia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa is charging import levy on UHT milk
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that , according to the tariff book, the applied tariff rate for SACU/SADC countries for this product is zero.
NTB-000-083	2.5. Decreed customs surcharges Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Agriculture	Mozambique	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa imposes surcharges on various agricultural products.
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that the Marketing Of Agricultural Products Act of 1996 (MAP Act), as amended, provides for the establishment of statutory measures, namely statutory levies, control of exports of agricultural products, records & returns, and registration
NTB-000-688	8.3. Immigration requirements (Visa, travel permit)	2016-03-29	South Africa: Beit Bridge	Zimbabwe	Resolved 2016-05-09	View
Complaint:	South Africa Immigration Offices at Beit Bridge gives drivers maximum 14 days on their passports when entering into SA at point of entry. When a driver departs before the 14 days are fully utilized, the next time you want to enter, they tell you to use those remaining days before they can add more days on your passport. This causes drivers to end up running short of days should their trip be longer than the remaining days before the normal 14 days. Zimbabwe transporters are therefore forced to send their drivers back to Beit Bridge without their trucks to get their passports re stamped or they are faced with fines or worse still, they will not be allowed to enter SA again for not exiting on or before the set day when they entered SA initially. This is increasing the cost of doing business. Transporters have lost business during the time drivers are hiking to the border to get passports stamped, the extra night allowances and bus fares and also the down time spent in the process. This problem is a lot worse if loads are short in SA as well. This matter needs urgent attention on the part of Home Affairs in South Africa as the hampering of transporter and driver movements is not in the interests of trade facilitation and inters regional trade in the region.
Resolution status note:	On 09 May 2016, the South African Focal Point provided the current Visa and Immigration requirements that state that: ‘Visas are not required by passport holders of Lesotho, Swaziland, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Malawi who are entering the Republic as commercial heavy-duty vehicle drivers provide their visits do not exceed 15 days and on condition that they can produce a letter confirming their employment with a transport company on entry. The same principle applies to Zimbabwean commercial heavy-duty vehicle drivers, except that their sojourn may not exceed 30 days at a time. The afore-mentioned does not apply to commercial heavy-duty vehicle drivers who transport goods for a South African transport company. Such drivers must be in possession of a valid work visa.’ The requirements are uploaded onto the Notifications window of the Online system www.tradebarriers.org as information to stakeholders . This document can be dowloaded by the public .
NTB-000-087	5.12. Export restraint arrangements	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Botswana	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa has put in place export restraints for the exportation of dried beans to that market
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that this barrier is no longer existing
NTB-000-080	1.8. Import bans Policy/Regulatory	2009-07-23	South Africa: Ministry of Trade	Zambia	Resolved 2010-11-22	View
Complaint:	South Africa has banned imports of all meat from Zambia
Resolution status note:	South Africa reported that importation of red meat from Zambia to SA was never allowed because Zambia did not send SA the information she needed to evaluate their animal disease situation, legislation, standards and other requirements. The information was requested in 2006 in the form of a questionnaire by the Department of Agriculture - Directorate Animal Health, Zambia has never responded.

<< Previous 1 2 3...14 15 16 17 18...41 42 43 Next >>

Display:

Non-Tariff Barriers

Reporting, Monitoring and Eliminating Mechanism

Resolved complaints